Hello List,
Better late than never: we added some screenshots of the Data Manager
module on our website (www.arsmarts.com).
Best regards,
Kaïs.
kais.albas...@arsmarts.com
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives
Hi Paul,
I am also stuck with exactly the same, need to perform ARS v7.6.04 silent
installation on linux. Would really appreciate if you could send me the
sanitized sample you are referring to in your post.
Regards,
Saurabh
--
View this message in context:
Hi All,
We Need the Service Targets to start measuring from Date and time field -
WO Type Field 06.
So SVTs start when condition used is -
WO Type Field 06'= $\TIMESTAMP$ .( WO Type Field 06 is a
date and time field on work order form)
But SVTs remains attached only even
I think there's a few reasons.
First, using TR. is redundant. Every value in a filter (unless it already has
DB. in front of it) is by it's nature a transactional value. There's literally
almost no reason to use, it, EXCEPT that it makes the code a bit more clear
from a visual standpoint if
Hi Joe and LJ,
You are wrong on Case 1:
If you set the City to Gotham, it will have a TR-value of Gotham even on a
Create.
Case 2 is nothing much to say about.
The problem with the TR value is:
A. If the value is NOT changed it can both be set or be empty during a Modify.
This depends on the
Hi,
Please don't use char-fields like this. They are dependent on the language
settings, and will be unpredictable especially on the client side via Active
Links.
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se
The DateNum function is your friend here, try this
Have a temp character field
Hi,
You are very limited with what you can do with the interfaces for SRM. The BMC
Communities has a plethora of information on what you can and cannot do and how
to do it.
The best way if using an external program would be to show the service in a
frame utilising a direct link and OOB
James,
This is to allow you to, for a specific field,
1) Determine programmatically if a (user or automated) transaction has
attempted to change the field value or not . OR -
2) Compare what the value used to be, just before the current
transaction attempted to change it, as
Thank you Howard!
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Richter, Howard (CEI - Atlanta) [howard.rich...@coxinc.com]
Received: Sunday, 11 May 2014, 8:05AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG]
Subject: OT: I just wanted to say
Hi,
There is one single real benefit from using TR-values.
If you have a field that is only referenced as 'TR.Field' in the run-if of any
filter, the database value will not be retrieved during the transaction. This
is a small performance benefit.
If you have any non-TR field reference in the
While most of everything you stated is in sync with my understanding of TR,
there is one small difference. MAYBE, I'm wrong and if so, I would love to
be corrected.
I can best explain this with an example.
Lets say a record is created and there is a field called 'City' and during
creation, that
11 matches
Mail list logo