Re: Remedy Scalability

2016-06-30 Thread Jarl Grøneng
Still there is always a limitation. I do remember a BMC represenative mention that a single arserverd (pre v9) process can handle about max 3000 users and still perform well. Adding more arserverd processes, you then increased the user base you can support... -- J 2016-06-30 19:55 GMT+02:00 LJ Lo

Re: Remedy Scalability

2016-06-30 Thread LJ LongWing
Keith, As Shawn mentioned, it's really dependent on so many other factorsbut, there is always the discussion of 'is one big box better than 5 small boxes'...depending on the need/cost/etc, the answer can change. One possible down side to a single large box is the high availability regarding it

ADM:timing test

2016-06-30 Thread arslist
Making sure it is still running ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Re: Remedy Scalability

2016-06-30 Thread Pierson, Shawn
I don't think there are hard and fast rules about it, because there are so many variations of CPUs, whether VMs or physical servers are involved, how you do reporting, etc. I've been in environments with huge server groups and mid tier servers...I have nightmares of going in and refreshing the

Remedy Scalability

2016-06-30 Thread Sinclair, Keith
Hi, I need some technical expertise with Remedy's infrastructure and scalability. We're using Linux and ARS 8.1 with Oracle 11 running on AWS servers. How scalable can Remedy truly be? Is it only limited by memory and CPU? Or are there choke points where a second or third server needs to be add