Still there is always a limitation. I do remember a BMC represenative
mention that a single arserverd (pre v9) process can handle about max 3000
users and still perform well. Adding more arserverd processes, you then
increased the user base you can support...
--
J
2016-06-30 19:55 GMT+02:00 LJ Lo
Keith,
As Shawn mentioned, it's really dependent on so many other factorsbut,
there is always the discussion of 'is one big box better than 5 small
boxes'...depending on the need/cost/etc, the answer can change. One
possible down side to a single large box is the high availability regarding
it
Making sure it is still running
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
I don't think there are hard and fast rules about it, because there are so many
variations of CPUs, whether VMs or physical servers are involved, how you do
reporting, etc. I've been in environments with huge server groups and mid tier
servers...I have nightmares of going in and refreshing the
Hi,
I need some technical expertise with Remedy's infrastructure and scalability.
We're using Linux and ARS 8.1 with Oracle 11 running on AWS servers.
How scalable can Remedy truly be? Is it only limited by memory and CPU? Or are
there choke points where a second or third server needs to be add
5 matches
Mail list logo