If that's the only product that can be used, you may be able to get a
waiver.
On Jan 27, 2017 12:52 PM, "Rackley, James A CIV"
wrote:
> **
>
> Listers,
>
>
>
> Greetings, all!
>
>
>
> As a warning, if you don't know what the acronyms DISA and STIG are, this
> discussion will likely give you a
You are back to the same issue I was describing….
When you have no permission to the hidden page holder, that page holder is not
constructed in the html page (just like if you had no permission to any field).
Now that that page holder is not constructed, there is no construction of any
of the
Thanks for this insight Doug!
Can you please elaborate on the other discovery? When we place a character
field and an attachment field on a hidden page holder with public permissions
the active links have access to both.
For instance they can open an attachment to present it to the user or can
"Information Assurance -- We're working *darned* hard to make sure you
can't!!"
I do not personally know of a CON, STIG or anything for that DB product.
Good luck!
-JDHood
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Rackley, James A CIV <
james.a.rack...@uscg.mil> wrote:
> **
>
> Listers,
>
>
>
> Greetin
Defense Information Systems Agency is DISA. They review and approve the Stigs.
The Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and the NSA Guides are the
configuration standards for DOD IA and IA-enabled devices/systems. Since 1998,
DISA has played a critical role enhancing the security p
Listers,
Greetings, all!
As a warning, if you don't know what the acronyms DISA and STIG are, this
discussion will likely give you a headache. If you do know what they mean,
you've likely had a headache for a very long time. :D
We're looking at an 8.1 to 9.1 upgrade of our environment
I had some testing done on the original question – what happens when you set
focus to a field that is hidden or not in view.
The results we had were that doing this quietly did nothing (as expected). We
even defined an operation to set focus to a field that doesn’t even exist on
the form and i
Hi Randy,
Splunk can also be very nice for correlating anomalies. We've had customers
e.g. explain why their mid-tiers are running slowly by correlating heavy load
on the virtual compute hardware that was not observable in the mid-tier virtual
server OS, much less tomcat. As Rick mentioned,
Randy,
When I was working at a company that had Splunk I was able to use it to
monitor all of my important log files (of course), but also wrote some
tools that generated specific data from Remedy such as transaction volumes
and such and displayed all of that information in charts in SplunkI ha
As with any monitoring tool, it's all in the configuration and support.
Our experience doesn't show it to be all that helpful, but I think that's
less he tool and more the experience level of those running it.
Rick
On Jan 27, 2017 09:13, "Mckinnish, Randy"
wrote:
> **
>
> Hey Listers,
>
> Anyon
Hey Listers,
Anyone using Splunk for monitoring mid tiers or your AR Servers? If so what are
your thoughts on any value that it adds? Our shop uses several tools already in
place and we now have Splunk for some of the other applications. Just wondering
if it's a better option and wanted to see w
I have seen similar behavior when using hidden tablefields in workflow.
--
J
2017-01-27 9:06 GMT+01:00 Thomas Miskiewicz :
> **
> Doug,
>
> we discovered some other issues with in this area too.
>
> 1. When an attachment field is not in the view PERFORM-ACTION-OPEN-ATTACHMENT
> fieldId stops wor
If your on v9.x. you can enable the Exeption Logging, and/or you can use
the the Always on Logging to dump the logs to file. Those method may give
you a clue.
--
J
2017-01-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 theReel :
> Hi Guys,
>
> We had a few blips in performance today and I suspect that someone was
> runni
Doug,
we discovered some other issues with in this area too.
1. When an attachment field is not in the view PERFORM-ACTION-OPEN-ATTACHMENT
fieldId stops working
2. When you place all kind of fields on a tab and the use has no access to the
page holder, the Active Link workflow can access field
Thomas,
I would consider this a bug.
The system should be gracefully degrading by noting that the fieldID is not in
the view and so take no action quietly.
If you are getting an error or failure of the screen, this is not what I would
expect.
Doug
From: Action Request System discussion list(
15 matches
Mail list logo