ading log files
**
Search for arloganalyzer on the bmcdn. arlogtmr has been retired, and
won't work on 7.x logs.
0. Install and add directory to your path
1. Copy all the relevant logs into a new folder
2 Open a command line into that folder
a Execute this command: arprep
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARLogAnalyzer
**
Dave,
I haven't downloaded or used this tool but I think its available on
Community Downloads unless they have taken it off there..
Joe
- Original
Dave,
I haven't downloaded or used this tool but I think its available on Community
Downloads unless they have taken it off there..
Joe
- Original Message
From: "Drake,Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2007 3:10:53 PM
S
Hi all,
Remedy support tells me there's a newer version of the arloganalyzer
(arwklga) tool out there somewhere that's better to use with an ARS 7
installation. Can somebody point me in the right direction? Thanks!
ARS 7.0.1, SQL 2K, WinServers
Dave Drake | Remedy Administrato
: ARLogAnalyzer output
Thad,
Well, rrrLic is the most popular one. Probably because it is easier to
understand than hardcor logfile analysis...
Regardless of the tool you use (Notepad works), I would urge everyone to
use the logfiles more. Both for performance and troubleshooting issues.
You do not need to
e API and SQL logs in detail to see what was pinging them so
heavily during that timeframe.
Good luck!
Matt R.
_
From: Thad Esser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARLogAnalyzer output
**
Hello,
I haven
rs."-- Richard
> Bach
>
>
>
> "Misi Mladoniczky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
>
> 01/31/2007 06:47 AM
> Please respond to
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>
>
> To
> arslist@ARSLIST.O
TED]>
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
01/31/2007 06:47 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: ARLogAnalyzer output
Hi,
I usually focus on the number of calls with "no gap", compared to the
total number
02 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: ARLogAnalyzer output
**
BTW, to answer your question, AVG Idle time is more important because it
gives you a reference over time about how busy the thread was. The MIN
Idle time only gives you a point in ti
uch better your
> system will be without just doing it and by trial and error. If you
> would like more info, or if I can further answer questions, contact me.
>
> Thanks,
> Rem
>
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:16:59 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> ARLogAnalyzer outputTo:
request.
I probably shoulda only answered your question instead of the book in the early
message. HAHA, oh well, hope some of this helps.
-- Rem
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:16:59 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ARLogAnalyzer
outputTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I haven't had much occasion to us
ter your system
will be without just doing it and by trial and error. If you would like more
info, or if I can further answer questions, contact me.
Thanks,
Rem
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:16:59 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ARLogAnalyzer
outputTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I haven't had much
Hello,
I haven't had much occasion to use the log analyzer very much, and I want
to make sure I'm interpreting the results correctly as part of thread
tuning. In determining if I need to increase my threads, which column is
more important, the "AVG Idle Time" or the "MIN Idle Time"? I can see
13 matches
Mail list logo
