20, 2007 12:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
Rick,
That is interesting. We are trying to setup Foundation and Topology
Discovery. These two pieces shared the same BMC Datastore. FD and TD
look to be small and lite, but the datastore that
)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
**
I suppose that if you have to choose, putting it on the DB is
probably
hone: 202-622-5541
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:54 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: BMC Foundation Discove
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
**
Well, that depends on two t
on its own server.
Rick
On 9/20/07, T Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** Can BMC Foundation Discovery Datastore be install on SQL Server
> specified instance or does it matter regarding performance? We only have
> one SQL Server box to work with.
>
> thanks
>
> Wi
Can BMC Foundation Discovery Datastore be install on SQL Server
specified instance or does it matter regarding performance? We only
have one SQL Server box to work with.
thanks
Window Server 2003
SQL 2005
BMC FD 1.4
Hi,
We have extended our CDM (CMDB) to absorb certain network CI's, we are
using BMC Foundation Discovery to discover network devices. However we
are
finding issues to extend the CDM of FD. FD populates data in the OOTB
CDM
and its classes. We are now facing a big pain to massage the data fr
7 matches
Mail list logo
