20, 2007 12:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
Rick,
That is interesting. We are trying to setup Foundation and Topology
Discovery. These two pieces shared the same BMC Datastore. FD and TD
look to be small and lite, but the datastore that
)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
**
I suppose that if you have to choose, putting it on the DB is
probably
hone: 202-622-5541
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:54 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: BMC Foundation Discove
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Foundation Discovery - Installation?
**
Well, that depends on two t
Well, that depends on two things - how powerful that server is, and to what
extent you're willing to deal with performance issues on that box when a
discovery process is running - FD will basically take over that box during
that process. There's a reason BMC recommends that FD be on its own server
Can BMC Foundation Discovery Datastore be install on SQL Server
specified instance or does it matter regarding performance? We only
have one SQL Server box to work with.
thanks
Window Server 2003
SQL 2005
BMC FD 1.4
_
6 matches
Mail list logo
