ber 05, 2011 3:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
**
I heard the same thing about Oracle case insensitivity too.. But what I would
like to know is compared to what?
Are we comparing an Oracle case sensitive database against
: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
**
Hi Bhupesh,
One thing that no one has mentioned on this thread is the consideration of case
sensitivity. If you want case-insensitive searches then MS-SQL would be a
better bet
case insensitive
issue. Just speaking from experience.
Thanks,
Sean
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Bhupesh Gupta
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Diff
John Doe
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 3:00 PM Newsgroups:
> public.remedy.arsystem.general
>
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
>
> You are certainly correct. If I use Oracle 10g client it is compatible
> with an Oracle
I hear that Joe, I had the exact same thing happen to me. After many hours of
troubleshooting (and the help of some others) I finally fixed it.
I made me weary of the "backwards compatibility statement."
Thanks again for sharing the story :-)
_
05, 2011 3:00 PM Newsgroups:
public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
You are certainly correct. If I use Oracle 10g client it is compatible with
an Oracle 11g database, as per the matrix. But that was not the
You are certainly correct. If I use Oracle 10g client it is compatible with an
Oracle 11g database, as per the matrix. But that was not the point. My point
is that simply saying that the product is compatible as long as the vendor
(Microsoft, Sun) claim backward compatibility is very presumpt
: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
John,
Thanks for the input. However, I am not completely sold on that line of
thinking. Oracle 11g client is unsupported while Oracle 11g database is
supported. Simply putting this back in the vendor's cou
John,
Thanks for the input. However, I am not completely sold on that line of
thinking. Oracle 11g client is unsupported while Oracle 11g database is
supported. Simply putting this back in the vendor's court is very
presumptuous.
___
Behalf Of John Doe
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
**
Hi Gupta,
I have not looked to see but is 7.6.04 compatible with Solaris 11 in the
compatibility matrix? I hope so because I'd like to up
> on SQL Server (like vendor). It's just all around an easier system to
> upgrade and maintain.
>
> ** **
> --
>
> *From:* Patrick Zandi
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2011 5:45 AM
> *Subject:* Re:
Server (like vendor). It's just all around an easier system to upgrade and
maintain.
From: Patrick Zandi
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
Solaris 11 is coming o
round an easier system to upgrade and
maintain.
From: Patrick Zandi
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: BMC Performance Matrix on ARS 7.6.04 on Different OS
Solaris 11 is coming out in days: sun boxes are claiming 5x p
Solaris 11 is coming out in days: sun boxes are claiming 5x performance with
new cpu's ... I would go that direction... Very soon
Just something to think about
Sent from my iPhone so typo's or funky words can and do happen!
On Oct 5, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Bhupesh Gupta wrote:
> **
> Hi - Does a
Hi - Does anybody has any input or any matrix on Performace og BMC ARS on
different OS, so that We can take a decision that Which OS is more suitable.
I have option of both Windows 2008 or Unix , but on Which OS BMC Product's
performace is better.
Please advise
--
Regards,
Bhupesh Gupta
_
15 matches
Mail list logo
