To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
Thanks Guys,
I agree with you. I noticed the part that doesn't make sense but believe it or
not I have a reasonable reason for using it. As for auditing, we've had our
share of issues with it but are (over) using
www.softwaretoolhouse.com
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of P Romain ARSlist
Sent: January 29, 2009 10:42 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
I use cmdbdriver to generate new classes so
.
yeah right
-Guillaume
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Ben Chernys
Sent: Thu 01/29/09 3:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement - Cause Found - Work-around
possible
** ?
Hi Guys
://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/products/SthMupd
http://www.softwaretoolhouse.com/products/SthMupd
__
Von:Chernys, Ben
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 09:37
An: Ben Chernys
Cc:
Betreff:ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
When we
)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FW: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
Hi Folks
I am having a ticket raised with BMC for this one but I just thought I'd pass
it to the list for any thoughts that may come
of Lyle Taylor
Sent: Wed 01/28/09 2:52 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
In my last position we struggled and fought with the Sandbox for quite a while,
finding issues here and there, and finally came to the conclusion that the
Sandbox provides no real
Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: January 28, 2009 9:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
I totally agree with Lyle.
It just does not make sense to have a sandbox that will be immediately
reconciled to production dataset. Besides restricting the updates
(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: January 28, 2009 9:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
I totally agree with Lyle.
It just does not make sense to have a sandbox that will be immediately
reconciled to production
Subject: Re: ITSM Issue with Sandbox Enablement
**
Thanks Guys,
I agree with you. I noticed the part that doesn't make sense but believe it or
not I have a reasonable reason for using it. As for auditing, we've had our
share of issues with it but are (over) using it.
I disabled
9 matches
Mail list logo
