Sweet :)
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Roys, Eric D
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 3:30 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - parseQualification Error - Part 2
**
Defect SW00351474 :-)
_
From
Defect SW00351474 :-)
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ Longwing
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - parseQualification Error - Part 2
**
I
:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ Longwing
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:59 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - parseQualification Error - Part 2
**
I would personally push them to admit and log a defect. Point being
that if they say you can use an ARServe
uest System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Roys, Eric D
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - parseQualification Error - Part 2
**
LJ,
Field ID or Name is irrelevant. What is suggested is inst
nd then it didn't but only for one minor situational
change.
-Eric
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ Longwing
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - pars
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Java API - parseQualification Error - Part 2
**
For anyone interested (part 2 of 2)...
Secondary response from support (it doesn't error as before):
Sample API program that works for me.. customer will need to change the
details marked with a " <--&
> For anyone interested (part 2 of 2)...
>
> Secondary response from support (it doesn't error as before):
>
> Sample API program that works for me.. customer will need to change
> the details marked with a " <--" for his test..
>
> import com.bmc.arsys.api.*;
> import java.util.*;
>
> pub
7 matches
Mail list logo
