st(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Migration in reverse
**
Well, you should start with the 64-bit Java. BMC states that it is
40-45% slower than the 32-bit Java.
Rick
On Jul 20, 2011 8:22 AM, &qu
Well, you should start with the 64-bit Java. BMC states that it is 40-45%
slower than the 32-bit Java.
Rick
On Jul 20, 2011 8:22 AM, "Larry Barnes" wrote:
> I have a development server running ITSM 7.6.04 on a VM with 8 gig of
> ram and is running SQL 2008 on a separate server. We are dealing wi
of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Larry Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Migration in reverse
I ha
This brings up a good question.
What is acceptable performance???
Has anybody built a benchmark for people to try?
Something like:
1000 inserts into a simple table (no workflow)
1000 inserts into a simple table (with complex workflow)
(workflow like -- if field 1 > 100 && field 2 != NULL -- the
I have a development server running ITSM 7.6.04 on a VM with 8 gig of
ram and is running SQL 2008 on a separate server. We are dealing with
slowness with ITSM and I'm not sure where the bottle neck is.
We are running (64 bit) Tomcat and Java; latest releases.
Java has an Initial memory pool of
5 matches
Mail list logo