Re: $OPERATION$ keyword w/Modify All

2017-10-16 Thread Fawver, Dustin
RSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Galat Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 10:40 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: $OPERATION$ keyword w/Modify All *** This email does NOT originate from an ETSU person or service. *** ** Hi Dustin – It may have to do with where in the p

Re: $OPERATION$ keyword w/Modify All

2017-10-14 Thread Mike Galat
) Perform a search: Display operation: SET (ARNOTE 1) Select all, then click Modify All: Window Open operation: SET ALL (ARNOTE 1) Your mileage may vary! Thanks, Michael Galat From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jason Miller Sent

Re: $OPERATION$ keyword w/Modify All

2017-10-14 Thread Jason Miller
Is the button really being set to Submit Ticket on Modify All because the $OPERATION$ is inaccurately resolving to CREATE or just because that is the default text of the button? Did you try using "SET ALL" for the $OPERATION$ comparison? https://docs.bmc.com/docs/ars91/keywords-6090

$OPERATION$ keyword w/Modify All

2017-10-13 Thread Fawver, Dustin
” when modifying a request. When I select multiple requests at once and choose “Modify All”, it appears that the value for $OPERATION$ is being set to “Create”, so the button reads “Submit Ticket”. While the operation still works as expected when clicking the button, I’d like to make the button

Re: 8.1.01 modify all on computer systems to bulk update status

2014-07-08 Thread Ben Chernys
System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Phillips Sent: July-08-14 00:22 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: 8.1.01 modify all on computer systems to bulk update status ** I have several hundred computer systems CI's that need to have the status changed from

8.1.01 modify all on computer systems to bulk update status

2014-07-07 Thread Rick Phillips
I have several hundred computer systems CI's that need to have the status changed from /Deployed/ to /In Inventory/, and there is workflow preventing a modify all - if the sandbox is enable, a modify all is not permitted, and if I disable the sandbox, I receive this error: /Modifying

Modify all for change request

2014-06-27 Thread Hodgdon, Paul
Is there a way to do a modify all on moving a change request from implementation in progress to complete? I don't see the ability to change the status under modify all. -Paul [Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CB1CFE.724B27B0] IT Accounts ITSM Applications Manager

Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Jase Brandon
Hello All, 7.6.04 SP2 The Help Desk gets a large group of automatically generated Incidents with a generic Service of automated ticket creation, they then need to do a modify all on these Incidents and assign en masse these Incidents with the correct assigned group, service, etc. All the rest

Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Brittain, Mark
) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jase Brandon Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:57 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk ** Hello All, 7.6.04 SP2 The Help Desk gets a large group of automatically generated Incidents with a generic Service

Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Tomasiewicz, Mike (Information Technology)
BMC has opened a defect for this very issue. Thanks! .: Mike T :. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tauf Chowdhury Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:05 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field

Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Jase Brandon
T :. *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Tauf Chowdhury *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 2:05 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk ** Jase, I think I remember

Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Tomasiewicz, Mike (Information Technology)
FROM BMC SUPPORT: Modify all will work for SERVICE field. If you want to update several records with the same SERVICE field value, this may not be possible with Modify All. Because if you select the menu on SERVICE field it requires the Company or Customer field to be populated

Re: Modify All and 'Service*+' field on HPD:Help Desk

2013-11-14 Thread Jase Brandon
Thanks Mike!!! You just made my day! :-) On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tomasiewicz, Mike (Information Technology) mike.tomasiew...@conagrafoods.com wrote: ** FROM BMC SUPPORT: Modify all will work for SERVICE field. If you want to update several records with the same SERVICE field

Re: Modify All Disabled on all CI Types

2013-07-02 Thread Smita Ithape
What is the ITSM version ?I could see it enabled for AST:ComputerSystem in dev stuif i go to Form properties and Menu access option.ITSM 7.6.04 On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS lisa.kemes@dla.mil wrote: ** Is there a reason why the modify

Re: Modify All Disabled on all CI Types

2013-07-02 Thread Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS
Sorry, it's enabled, but when I try to do a Modify All, it says Modify All is not supported in sandbox mode We are on 7.6.04 Sp2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Smita Ithape Sent: Tuesday, July 02

Modify All Disabled on all CI Types

2013-07-01 Thread Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS
Is there a reason why the modify all Action field is disabled out of the box for the join forms like AST:Equipment, AST:ComputerSystem etc? The Manage Bulk Update link only allows you to update the location (sans the room and floor for some reason) and relate the CI's to people. Just

Re: Modify All Disabled on all CI Types

2013-07-01 Thread Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS
Whoops! ARS/ITAM 7.6.04 sp2 -Original Message- From: Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:28 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Modify All Disabled on all CI Types Is there a reason why the modify all Action field is disabled out of the box

Re: Notify after Modify All

2012-10-30 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Notify after Modify All ** Hi All, I am trying to send a notification email after performing a Modify All Operation. Basically after assigning multiple tickets to a member, I would like to send a email notification mentioning that the tickets have been assigned

Re: Notify after Modify All

2012-10-30 Thread pritch
Modify All Raj, Unfortunately, a filter fires on an individual record, not a set of records. There is no built in mechanism to do what you are looking for...only the ability to send an email on each record. To be able to do what you are looking for you would need to build a console that allows

Re: Notify after Modify All

2012-10-30 Thread Raj
AM Subject: Re: Notify after Modify All Raj, Unfortunately, a filter fires on an individual record, not a set of records. There is no built in mechanism to do what you are looking for...only the ability to send an email on each record. To be able to do what you are looking for you

Notify after Modify All

2012-10-29 Thread Raj
Hi All, I am trying to send a notification email after performing a Modify All Operation. Basically after assigning multiple tickets to a member, I would like to send a email notification mentioning that the tickets have been assigned to the particular Assignee. For e.g., 10 tickets assigned

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-30 Thread Ray Palla
I found another work-around as well. I created an Active Link that fires on the 'Modify All' screen Save button. It runs only on $OPERATION$ = SET ALL and simply triggers a 'Run Process' PERFORM-ACTION-APPLY. The only ill-effect from this new AL was that a 'Modify All' in the fat client

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-30 Thread Ray Palla
Absolutely. Good catch. r -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:28 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form You

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-28 Thread Tauf Chowdhury
Ray, A workaround would be to relate those incidents to one incident as duplicate of and the. Close the master. However, this wouldn't work if the tickets were not really related to each other. Still, if you're using a modify all, they can't be that different so it may work. Sent from my iPhone

'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-27 Thread Ray Palla
Ladies and Gents; Has anyone else seen this or found a fix? We have the need to close multiple tickets all at one time in the Incident form of ITSM 7.6.04. From the web client, when a list is displayed and multiple tickets selected, the 'Modify All' button is visible and active. The button

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-27 Thread Chuck
I think this can be done from the IM console via quick action. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-27 Thread Ray Palla
Actually Chuck; That only works if the ticket is already in Resolved state. It simply resets the 'Status' to Closed. What we need to do is set several open tickets at once to 'Status' Resolved and include a 'Resolution' and perhaps a 'Notes' entry on each. Modify All is the method used

Re: 'Modify All' on ITSM HPD:Help Desk 7.6.04 form

2012-07-27 Thread Brock, Anne
That was fixed it in either patch 1 or patch 2 of 7.6.04. I think you just have to upgrade the midtier. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ray Palla Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:22 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: 'Modify All

Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Rick Cook
I need to make a mass update to the CIs in my CMDB. Just one field, all to the same new value. Just ise Modify All, right? Wrong. In Sandbox mode, Modify All is disabled. So I think what I have to do is create a new Sandbox dataset, pull a copy of the master dataset into it, do the Modify All

Re: Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Roger Justice
The only way to do a Modify all is to open the Base Element form in the User tool and then you can do it. -Original Message- From: Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 3:44 pm Subject: Modify All in CMDB ** I need to make a mass

Re: Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Rick Cook
That seems odd, since the records don't live in Base Element. I will give it a shot, though. Rick On Mar 21, 2012 3:47 PM, Roger Justice rjust2...@aol.com wrote: ** The only way to do a Modify all is to open the Base Element form in the User tool and then you can do it. -Original

Re: Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Roger Justice
Part of the record is in Base element and part is in the CMDB regular form. The only way to do a modify all when in any dataset other than BMC.Asset is through the underlying forms. -Original Message- From: Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, Mar

Re: Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Rick Cook
and part is in the CMDB regular form. The only way to do a modify all when in any dataset other than BMC.Asset is through the underlying forms. -Original Message- From: Rick Cook remedyr...@gmail.com To: arslist arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 4:01 pm Subject: Re: Modify All

Re: Modify All in CMDB

2012-03-21 Thread Kevin Morgan
. This will limit the number of records searched to just that class. You can then do the modify all from there. Kevin *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Rick Cook *Sent:* Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:12 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

SRD take offline Modify all... 7.6.04

2012-02-14 Thread patrick zandi
is there a way to do modify all and take them all offline.. I can most likely do an escalation, but was wondering.. I have 2289 of them.. -- Patrick Zandi ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org

Re: SRD take offline Modify all... 7.6.04

2012-02-14 Thread patrick zandi
escalation worked just fine On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:19 PM, patrick zandi remedy...@gmail.com wrote: is there a way to do modify all and take them all offline.. I can most likely do an escalation, but was wondering.. I have 2289 of them.. -- Patrick Zandi -- Patrick Zandi

Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-15 Thread Theo Fondse
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Anderson Debra (PRN) Sent: 14 June 2011 23:48 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client I agree with Fred filters really are the only option I can see working. However

Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-15 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
when user uses the Modify All option in the client I agree with Fred filters really are the only option I can see working. However, has anyone ever seen a case where set fields doesn't seem to work across all records selected for Modify All. Do you know if any issue with how fields are set

Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-14 Thread Anderson Debra (PRN)
Hi Everyone, We're using ARS 7.0 all custom code system. In the past I have pretty much not allowed user's to use the modify ALL option however I have a new feature where there is a strong request to allow this option. Unfortunately I am having some challenges getting workflow that would

Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-14 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
Filters are the only way to go to validate data during Modify All. All Set Fields used to pull in data (needed for validation) should also be in the Filters. Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf

Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-14 Thread Joe Martin D'Souza
If absolutely necessary to be done at client level, you could run an AL table loop to validate data followed by the Modify All operation couldn't you? Joe -Original Message- From: Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:01 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general

Re: Data validation checks when user uses the Modify All option in the client

2011-06-14 Thread Anderson Debra (PRN)
I agree with Fred filters really are the only option I can see working. However, has anyone ever seen a case where set fields doesn't seem to work across all records selected for Modify All. Do you know if any issue with how fields are set - via SQL query vs. regular form query? Thanks Debra

Re: ARS 7.6.04 and Modify All Not Working

2011-04-28 Thread Ray Gellenbeck
None of my developers have seen this behavior in 7.6.04, but we are a green field build, not an ugrade. The Incident team just used Modify All to populate a new field added to the HPD:HelpDesk schema with no problem. However, we are an Oracle 11g shop with a hybrid of RHEL6 and Win2k8DC R2

ARS 7.6.04 and Modify All Not Working

2011-04-27 Thread Bruce Sisk
Environ: ARS 7.6.04 | MS SQL 2008 | Windows 2008 Has anyone noticed a problem with Modify All feature?? The option for Modify All is there...after doing a search of tickets I want to modify all...I click the button and the fields clear as they always have...I enter values in the fields

Incident Management. Using Relationship tab in 'Modify All' action

2010-07-20 Thread Sergio Tomillero
Hello List, Does anybody know how to do the next? I would like to be able to create a relationship in a 'Modify all' action. That is to say, I select some incidents and press 'Modify all', relationship tab buttons turn to disable but instead I enabled them, I could not work search or create

Modify All Functionality in Asset Management

2009-11-12 Thread tina flores
a People relationship (Support Group) Current Issue: When the 'Modify All' functionality is used, no security is in place. Even 'Asset User' with read-only permissions on a CI can modify record. OOB: When I logged in as An Asset Viewer (as well as Asset User), and used 'Modify All' functionality, I

Modify All User's Application Preferences in ITSM 7

2008-10-07 Thread jham36
Hi Group, Does anyone know of a way to modify all User's Application Preferences in ITSM 7? I want to hide the Vendor and Finance tab from the Incident form. The check boxes I need to access for all user's is on the Application Preferences form. I can change my own preferences and also

Re: Modify All User's Application Preferences in ITSM 7

2008-10-07 Thread jham36
and only got 2 results back, mine and the default. Thanks, James On Oct 7, 5:36 pm, jham36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Group, Does anyone know of a way to modify all User's Application Preferences in ITSM 7? I want to hide the Vendor and Finance tab from the Incident form.  The check boxes I

Modify All Operation Disabled on Change Form on ITSM 7.02

2008-08-08 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
or some particular users or deploying some other hardware or software to user(s). At times our users complete the requests in the field and perform the services and then want to then go back in Remedy and close out the changes. I discovered that for some reason the Modify All operation was disabled

Re: Modify All Operation Disabled on Change Form on ITSM 7.02

2008-08-08 Thread T. Dee
The gotchas would depend on what you modify with modify all. All of hidden fields are set depending on what you do. I would change one record in the normal way without Modify All and turn on logging and see what is being set. On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Lammey, Peter A. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Kemes, Lisa
When I modify a field on my form and save the record, it kicks off the workflow (active link) that I created. When I do the same modification to the same field with a Modify All action it does not kick off the workflow. Does anyone know why this would happen? Lisa Kemes AR System Developer

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Gary Opela (Corporate)
Whenever you do a modify all, I believe that if you reference any of the fields in your run-if qualification, then the active link might act funny, since it doesn't know the value in the field. I believe this is the reason why, although I'm sure that I will be corrected if this is not correct

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Lisa Westerfield
The Modify All action skips Active Link processing entirely. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:37 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Modify vs Modify All ** When I modify a field on my

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Shellman, David
** Gary, As Lisa noted, Modify All does not trigger Active Links. A Modify All changes the data at the server and not at the client which is where Active Links execute. Dave - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless) From: Action Request

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Rick Cook
One thing to remember is that Modify = a SET Operation, while Modify All = a SET ALL Operation. There is no check box for Modify All on an Active Link, so I think you'd have to explicitly set Active Links to also fire on $OPERATION$ = SET ALL to make them fire on a Modify All action. Rick

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
You notice that in the Active Link definition Basic tab there are Execute On options for Modify and After Modify. There are no Execute On options for Modify All or After Modify All. The only active links that can fire on a Modify All window are Window Open, or ones that fire on a single field

Re: Modify vs Modify All

2008-07-07 Thread Shyam Attavar
a filter run if qualification of $OPERATION$ = SET ALL and that filter never got called. -- Shyam - Original Message - From: Kemes, Lisa Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 1:36 PM Subject: Modify vs Modify All

Re: Active Link and Modify All

2008-04-11 Thread Brian Goralczyk
. As for selecting the records that a record fires on a modify all, I was under the impression that it only updated the records that were selected. As an alternative, you could possibly create a display only form with a table field of the records you wanted to update and do an active link table walk

Active Link and Modify All

2008-04-08 Thread Moore, Christopher Allen
All, the active link won't run on all the records, just one. Is there a way to make an active link fire for all selected records on a modify all action? Thanks, Chris ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives

Modify All

2007-11-13 Thread Gary Roach
If I wanted to use the Modify All function, and change several peoples email addresses from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], how would I go about this ? Thanks, Gary Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Global Information Technology

Re: Modify All

2007-11-13 Thread Reiser, John J
attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased by me From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Roach Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:23 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Modify All

User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All

2007-09-07 Thread John Kovalcik
Listers, I have run in to a problem doing a Modify all on the 7.0.01 user tool. When doing a modify all on CHG:Task, if the first record has a blank assignee, then it will NULL out all assignee's in the following records. Has anyone seen this issue ? It doesn't do it in the 6.x

Re: User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All

2007-09-07 Thread Bryan Waters
John, I ran across a similar issue recently. Make sure there is no workflow setting the field to NULL or an empty string on triggers such as lose focus, menu choice, etc.. For some reason, the Modify All operation was pushing an empty/NULL value even though I had not directly updated

Re: User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All

2007-09-07 Thread Shyam Attavar
: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:50 AM Subject: User Tool 7.0.01 and Modify All ** Listers, I have run in to a problem doing a Modify all on the 7.0.01 user tool. When doing a modify all on CHG:Task, if the first record has a blank

Unix Command line Macro - Modify All

2007-09-04 Thread Blankenship, Mark (Mark)
Listers, I am trying to implement a command line macro to execute a Modify All. (I won't go into 'why' here) I started with a basic macro updating one record (not modify all) It works in windows client. It works in windows command line. After Dos-to Unix conversion, it works in Unix

Re: Unix Command line Macro - Modify All

2007-09-04 Thread Carey Matthew Black
Mark, You are a brave sole. Asking for sarcasm that early on a Monday morning after the next version was released. :) However, I will withhold a stab at how Push actions have total replaced Modify All macro workflow. I would try the operation without the Dos-to Unix conversion step

SW00264343 - Modify All Errors with ARERR 326

2007-07-12 Thread Reiser, John J
Hello Listers, I opened a ticket with BMC Support about an issue with Modify All clearing a Required Field on my form and throwing ARERR 326. Then I found a list entry about SW00264343. When I checked with BMC Support it was listed as fixed. No version reference or any other explanation ( unless

Re: Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug?

2007-06-19 Thread Kyle Whitley
2007 10:23 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug? Hi Jase, We had a similar issue and looking closer at the log it was found that one activelink was setting the description field to null on Window Open action when Modify All operation was performed

Re: Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug?

2007-06-05 Thread Francois - BTT
Hi All, This looks like bug number SW00264343. Regards Francois -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mohan Panchangmath Sent: 04 June 2007 10:23 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Modify All Nulls Description

Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug?

2007-06-04 Thread Jase Brandon
Hello All, Help Desk 7.0.02 When just discovered that when I perform a modify all operation on Case, I get ARERR [326] Required field cannot be reset to a NULL value : 24007 24007 is the Description Field. I logged Active Links/Filters and saw nothing in the log that would set

Re: Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug?

2007-06-04 Thread Roger Justice
This is something new to version 7 when you do a modify all. I have not reported it since it has not caused me major problems so far. It may be a bug since when you do a, modify all, all of the fields are blanked out as expected. It seems as if the lastest version does not hold the data

Re: Modify All Nulls Description Field = Possible Bug?

2007-06-04 Thread Mohan Panchangmath
Hi Jase, We had a similar issue and looking closer at the log it was found that one activelink was setting the description field to null on Window Open action when Modify All operation was performed. Thanks, Mohan --- Jase Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, Help Desk 7.0.02

Re: Cleint Bug (Minor) in 7.0.01-patch01 with Modify All and Hour Glass

2007-02-24 Thread Robert Molenda
Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A. Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 11:40 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Cleint Bug (Minor) in 7.0.01-patch01 with Modify All and Hour Glass What about the fact that before you

Cleint Bug (Minor) in 7.0.01-patch01 with Modify All and Hour Glass

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Molenda
I found today and opened a ticket, that the 7.0.01-Patch 01 user tool, when doing the modify all for a large amount of records, sets the cursor to the hour-glass in the beginning, but quickly returns it to the pointer, giving the illusion that the operation has completed, but is still actually

Re: Cleint Bug (Minor) in 7.0.01-patch01 with Modify All and Hour Glass

2007-02-23 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:25 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Cleint Bug (Minor) in 7.0.01-patch01 with Modify All and Hour Glass I found today and opened a ticket, that the 7.0.01-Patch 01 user tool, when doing the modify all for a large amount