ion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Palmer
> *Sent:* Friday, November 13, 2009 14:13
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Prod server down - services will not stay up
>
> **
> We've turned on both sql and api logging now to capture th
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 14:13
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Prod server down - services will not stay up
**
We've turned on both sql and api logging now to ca
, 2009 13:57
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Prod server down - services will not stay up
**
Thanks Ben
We're having problems determining where the 11 is coming from.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Ben Chernys
wrote:
**
PS. The 91 is a red herring.
discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Palmer
> *Sent:* November 13, 2009 8:57 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Prod server down - services will not stay up
>
> **
> Thanks Ben
>
> We're having problems determini
: Prod server down - services will not stay up
**
Thanks Ben
We're having problems determining where the 11 is coming from.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Ben Chernys
wrote:
**
PS. The 91 is a red herring. It's the Sig 11 (SEGV) you need to worry
about. The 91 is anoth
n the servers initial processing of the
meta-data.
Cheers
Ben
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: November 13, 2009 8:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Prod server down - services will not st
is another process not being able to communicate with the
> arserverd process.
>
> Cheers
> Ben
>
> --
> *From:* Ben Chernys [mailto:ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.com]
> *Sent:* November 13, 2009 8:42 PM
> *To:* 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG&#x
27;arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Prod server down - services will not stay up
The signal 11 is bad code - simple as that. It's a "segmentation violation"
which means that the server (arserverd) attempted to read or write to an
address not allocated to its virtual spac
ally, there may be patches available that address the problem.
Cheers
Ben Chernys
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer
Sent: November 13, 2009 8:30 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Prod server down - service
Help !!
Working with support but could use anyone else's input. I'm at WWRUG so
it's somewhat limiting.
We did a truss log and and when the services drop (arerror 91) we see the
following:
167
/11:read(54, "\0FE\0\006\0\0\0\0\01017".., 2064)= 254
/11:write(54, "\0A1\0\006\0\0\0\0\003
10 matches
Mail list logo
