t
Subject: Re: IP Devices and CMDB 2.1 Classes
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 2:32 PM
**
BMC FD/TD Discovery creates an IP Endpoint class for the IP and a LAN Endpoint
CI for the MAC address and relates these together (dependency where the MAC is
the parent if I reme
That's right, you got to create a relationship
-Guillaume
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Louise Van
Hine
Sent: Fri 03/20/09 1:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: IP Devices and CMDB 2.1 Classes
So when the IP addresse
pull the best practice card then I'd go with the above.
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Louise Van Hine
Sent: 20 March 2009 17:49
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: IP Devices and CMDB 2.1 Classes
**
So whe
of concept system in any case, so we can try different things
to see what works.
--- On Fri, 3/20/09, Guillaume Rheault wrote:
From: Guillaume Rheault
Subject: Re: IP Devices and CMDB 2.1 Classes
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009, 11:14 AM
**
You can also use the LA
can store multiple virtual IPs.
-Guillaume
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Lyle Taylor
Sent: Thu 03/19/09 6:40 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: IP Devices and CMDB 2.1 Classes
I believe the IP Endpoint class is intended to
I believe the IP Endpoint class is intended to document things like IP
addresses. Adding an attribute for IP address is probably not a good solution,
unless you know that the device will only have one (or some maximum number of)
IP address(es). As noted in someone else's reply, there is a fiel
Hi Louise,
At one customer I added an IP attribute to computer system because they also
weren't interested in doing anything with this data except store it.
At other customers we've used the IP Endpoint class primarily because that's
where BMC Discovery puts this data. Different IPs were di
7 matches
Mail list logo
