...@m-labs.hk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:01 PM
To: Srinivas, Raghavendra (IntlAssoc)
Cc: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk
Subject: Re: [ARTIQ] [RFC] remove output event replacement feature
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Srinivas, Raghavendra (IntlAssoc)
wrote:
>>Back-to-back puls
>Back-to-back pulses are troublesome. Is that being used actively?
As Daniel mentioned, for Ramsey experiments when you're scanning the delay,
when the delay is 0 you'd have two back to back pi/2 pulses. How would that
need to be coded differently? Explicitly,
ttl.pulse(t_pi/2)
delay(t)
ttl.pul
