[ARTIQ] test

2017-11-06 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ
Please disregard this message. ___ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq

Re: [ARTIQ] test

2016-12-01 Thread Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) via ARTIQ
This is a test sent from a NIST email address. > -Original Message- > From: ARTIQ [mailto:artiq-boun...@lists.m-labs.hk] On Behalf Of Sébastien > Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:24 PM > To: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk > Subject: [ARTIQ] tes

Re: [ARTIQ] test

2016-11-30 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ
--- Begin Message --- Another test On Thursday, December 01, 2016 01:24 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ wrote: Testing new Mailman options that hopefully will stop triggerring the NIST/Microsoft email spoofing detector. Can someome from NIST reply to this message and confirm that they don'

[ARTIQ] test

2016-11-30 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ
Testing new Mailman options that hopefully will stop triggerring the NIST/Microsoft email spoofing detector. Can someome from NIST reply to this message and confirm that they don't get "This sender failed our fraud detection checks" messages anymore?

Re: [ARTIQ] test

2014-06-05 Thread Robert Jordens
On 06/05/2014 07:05 AM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/05/2014 11:22 AM, Robert Jordens wrote: >> I have asked a few more interested people here to subscribe to the >> mailing list. And I will get them to dig up example experiments or have >> them try to implement their example expe

Re: [ARTIQ] test

2014-06-02 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq
On 06/02/2014 10:52 AM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote: > this is a test ...with the correct domain name this time. ___ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq Migen/MiSoC: please use de...@lists.m-labs.hk instead.