Hi Elisa,
>From the error message I can't say immediately what is going wrong. But the
>development version is a quickly changing target and the snapshot version you
>downloaded is already two months old. Probably a bad move on our part to even
>provide snapshots of the development version in p
and just seeing this...
shouldn't lead to a built error, but later on when running checks: with
arts2.3 you also want to use the corresponding version of arts-xml-data,
i.e. arts-xml-data2.3.
good luck!
Jana
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Jana Mendrok wrote:
> Hi Elisa,
>
> please generally po
Hi Elisa,
please generally post questions to the user mailinglist, not to individuals.
I don't have an answer to your build question. but someone on the list
might have and pick up the case ... (Oliver should know).
wishes,
Jana
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Elisa Castelli
wrote:
> Hi Jana
Hi Elisa,
thanks for the reporting. and perfectly correct solution that your choose
to solve the runtime error problem. (running the test here, i get a runtime
error already on the ab_lookup part :O).
anyway, please do NOT use the arts2.2 disort, it is buggy. good that you
brought that up; we sho
Hi,
when using the example in
/arts-2.2.24/controlfiles/artscomponents/disort (TestDISORT.arts)
I get the following error:
ERROR: Radiance difference between interpolation
points is too large (factor 3) to
safely interpolate. This might be due to za_grid
being too coarse or the radiance field
