In a message dated 9/18/2007 7:18:29 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Conversely, the pseudo-science of intelligent design is accepted >as fact despite > lacking anything resembling real scientific support." Irreducable Complexity. It's a science thing. Wonder if the pro- science poster who wrote the above has studied enough science to even have heard of it. I guess this is the part where you start posting a bunch of links about it. Don't bother. I prefer to draw my conclusion from the original work and doing my own analysis. That too is a science think. Dan S created a moderated group a while back. Werner and Hinge pleaded here about remaining within the parameters of the group's description. Hinge even started a politics group. I joined both Dan's and Hinge's groups. My spam box is loaded with emails from a few posters, both anonymous members and the infamous antagonizers here. Helps me to avoid temptation. In deference to Hinge et al., my response to the message cited above, see _Click here: asburypolitics : Message: Convoluted Reasoning and Interminable Threads_ (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asburypolitics/message/37) ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
