New extremes in pupil spending
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 04/2/06
It wasn't that many years ago that New Jersey's school funding 
inequities, highlighted in Jonathan Kozol's book "Savage 
Inequalities," pointed to the gross disparity in spending between 
wealthy and poor school districts.
In New Jersey, the extremes were represented by Princeton, which in 
1990 spent more than $8,000 per pupil, and Camden, which spent about 
$4,000.

Today, those extremes still exist. But thanks to a succession of 
court rulings and weak-willed Legislatures, the disparities now come 
largely at the expense of middle-class school districts. According to 
recently released statistics for 2005-06, the spending gap between 
the state's 31 poorest school districts and districts that are 
neither rich nor poor continues to widen.

The 31 Abbott districts, the state's poorest, enroll 21 percent of 
New Jersey's 1.35 million schoolchildren, but receive about half of 
the state's school aid. That doesn't include the disproportionate 
share of the billions spent — and in some cases wasted — on new 
school construction and rehabilitation in the Abbotts. The average 
per-pupil cost in the Abbotts in 2005-06 was more than one-third 
higher than in the non-Abbotts.

If someone were to write a book today focusing on the new inequities 
in school funding, the extremes could be represented by Newark and 
Brick, both large K-12 districts. Per-pupil spending in Newark is up 
to $16,351, nearly double that of Brick ($8,464), Toms River Regional 
($8,709) and Jackson ($8,983).

An even more glaring example could be found in two mid-sized K-12 
districts — Asbury Park ($18,893) and South River ($7,521). That's 
right. Per-pupil spending in Asbury Park is 2 1/2 times higher than 
in the lower-middle class Middlesex County community.

What is the Legislature doing about it? The same thing it has been 
doing for years: Ducking the issue and watching things get further 
out of hand. Under Gov. Corzine's budget, things will again get 
worse. He has proposed flat school aid for all school districts 
except the Abbotts. While he has recommended modest aid reductions 
for some of the Abbott districts — including Asbury Park, Long Branch 
and Neptune — overall funding in the Abbotts will increase slightly.

Asbury Park, in line for a $581,971 aid cut — less than 1 percent of 
its total budget — seems confident the aid will be restored. And then 
some. Despite flat enrollment, the school board last week introduced 
a budget that would raise spending 12.4 percent next year. If you 
divide the projected student enrollment of 3,358 by the $89.4 million 
budget, it works out to $25,268 per pupil.

The only questions raised by the school board about the 
appropriateness of spending $8 million more this year than last 
centered around how best to wrest the money from Trenton. "I think 
the state is reasonable," Business Administrator Aiman Mahmoud 
said. "And I think the state will attempt to work with us to give us 
the funding we need to operate the district." If history repeats 
itself, Asbury Park will get that and far more.

The board knows full well it doesn't hurt to ask for the sky. And it 
has done just that. Its budget summary includes a one-page list of 
new spending requests, including a professional development 
consultant, $173,800; another professional development consultant, 
$150,717; permanent substitutes, $84,000; and a social worker, 
$85,000. Asbury Park's ratio of 1 teacher for every 9.3 students is 
the second lowest of the Abbotts. Only Keansburg, another district 
addicted to state aid, is lower (1 for every 8.4).

The Asbury Park school board won't hear any objections about the 
budget from the community, which the board promised last week would 
not be asked to contribute any more than the current $4.8 million — 
an amount that hasn't changed for the past six years. When people who 
live outside the district pick up 94 percent of the tab — as is the 
case in Asbury Park — why complain?

What's remarkable is that more people residing outside the Abbott 
districts — the ones who are picking up the Abbott tab while being 
told there's no money for their schools — aren't downright apoplectic 
by now. We hope we won't have to wait for another book on school 
spending disparities before the governor and Legislature do something 
about them.


 E-mail article   Print article   Subscribe   Get e-mail alerts  
Advertisement

 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to