I keep saying it but Asbury Couple just doesn't get it. I have not,
and will not, blame the current council for a deal they did not
negotiate. However, no matter how bleak the picture was at the time,
I don't think it is being an armchair quarterback by saying the deal
is lopsided to the
This list has been criticized for not allowing different and positive points
of view. I think it is in everybody's best interest to make different points
of view welcome on the list. So I am glad to facilitate that.
But I must confront the armchair/Monday morning quarterback analogy. That
I agree with almost everything you said. A change for the sake of a change is
probably doomed. Unless I have a candidate with substantially better
credentials I may end up voting for one or more on the re-elect ticket myself.
But the better deal in the wings part I don't see. My complaint
This council may be performing, doing their jobs, as well as can be
reasonably expected given their skills, experience and intellect;
provided they've not been bought. What we don't know, and council
refuses to reveal, is the details of the process they've undertaken
with the developer and
