"With the scheduled condemnations
it appears Asbury Partners is
squaring off its parcels up to the redevelopment boundary.
calling
these three projects "fast track" is like saying jumbo shrimp."
Tommy try not to take this personally; why don't we call a spade a
spade (this has nothing to do with your dogma re the absence of
racism) and call the project what Fishman, Weldon and Aaron
knowfraud. There is no master developer. Rather a very lucky
incompetent who happened to hit a homerun; that he screwed up
everything since should surprise no one.
Fast track is, as Monty Python might say, demised, utterly without
life, stiff as a board, finished. All we can expect is more grabbing
of land that the poor incompetent knows not what to do with. I figure
one more election ought correct this mess.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan: I'm not going to disagree with you on speed. I have to
> concede
> > the lack of deadlines in the agreement has always worried me.
> >
>
> Glad you share that view. The lack of schedules, deadlines and
> penalties/remedies is telling (multiple choice answer).
>
> > Question though for the group to weigh in on (I've always wondered
> > about this): Is part of the speed problem these past 3 years at
> all
> > attributable to having to get approvals from Tech Review
> Commmittee,
> > and Planning Board, and Council (often the same folks on all 3,
> who
> > sometimes disapprove of thier own work and send it back to -
> > themselves for further review)and also having to be approved by
> the
> > DEP with CAFRA? Is this too much government oversight gumming up
> > the works?
> >
> I'll plead ignorance on the inner workings of these bodies. However,
> what would their shoetcomings have to do with Fishman actually even
> coming up with a plan? For instance, the promised plan to restore
> the Casino? Or how about the permanent pavillions? We never even get
> a plan that these bodies could screw up in your opinion.
>
> > Second question while we are at it: After the 3 fast-track
> > projects, what is supposed to be tackled next? And after that?
> And
> > After that?
>
> I am unsure if it is specified in the agreement. Basically, it's
> whatever Fishman feels he can flip to someone. This is the inherent
> problem with the agreement, but it's too late. With the scheduled
> condemnations I see listed for council hearings, it appears Asbury
> Partners is squaring off its parcels up to the redevelopment
> boundary. I don't know if this means it is ready to market these or
> has any one interested in them. BTW, calling these three
> projects "fast track" is like saying jumbo shrimp.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
