Alternate strategy is good, but if we start collecting money to do
something they should do then for sure they will never do it. I am
not talking about negative publicity. Perhaps I am too much of an
optimist, but I beleive if you really had a 3 vote majority on the
council to enforce the agr
>But I ain't giving one nickel for something that APArtners
> should be doing as part of the agreement.
I understand what you're saying and I think you may be standing with the
majority of people in town; however, I think that if everyone is set on
forcing Asbury Partners to live up to the agre
ccupancy
after
> completion.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dfsavgny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:57 PM
> To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Restoration of historic properties
>
>
>
>
> Tony, we c
Title: RE: [AsburyPark] Re: Restoration of historic properties
Well - the Casino is one of the things about Asbury that I love. And even though I agree with you Dan, I would still donate money because I want it saved. Maybe the donated money could be a very low interest construction loan
Tony, we could use more love-fests here (sic). Mark and Lightly,
yes, I would donate money as well and would be willing to assist in
raising money, UNDER OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES but not these. If for
instance, the property or properties were under public ownership
still then I would do it and per
As long as there are condtions like Mark has listed I would be
willing.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would donate money for the Casino. In return we would have to
get
> promises from Asbury Partners and the Council commensurate with
the mone
