Hey Kevin. Let's be honest. You are spamming this group. Plain and simple. And 
because 
of your spamming, you've brought this group to a grinding halt. Can't you be a 
reasonable 
man and allow this group to discuss Asbury Park, the very reason for it's 
existance?

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tortious Interference with Conduct of a Business 
> The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 5 (May, 1947), pp. 885-891
> doi:10.2307/792964
> This article consists of 7 page(s). 
> 
> 
> http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0044-0094(194705)56%3A5%3C885%
> 3ATIWCOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Mario" <MarioAPNJ@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > "To chill the valid exercise…of freedom of speech."
> > 
> > Click here: US CODE: Title 47,230. Protection for private blocking 
> and
> > screening of offensive material
> > 
> <http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000230-
> --\
> > -000-.html>
> > 
> > (a) The Congress finds the following: …
> > 
> > (b) It is the policy of the United States— …
> > 
> > (c) (1) No provider or user of an interactive computer service 
> shall be
> > treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by
> > another information content provider.
> > 
> > (2) Civil liability --  No provider or user of an interactive 
> computer
> > service shall be held liable on account of— …
> > 
> > =======================================
> > 
> > E.g.:  http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Barrett_v_Rosenthal/
> > <http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Barrett_v_Rosenthal/>
> > 
> > At issue... medical doctors who publicly criticize what they 
> consider
> > quackery. The defendants had published or republished the e-mail on 
> the
> > internet. The trial court dismissed the case ... "brought primarily 
> to
> > chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of
> > speech and petition for redress of grievances…."
> > 
> > The California Supreme Court…in November, 2006,… a landmark
> > decision that is the first to interpret Section 230 defamation 
> immunity
> > as providing immunity to an individual internet "user" who is not a
> > provider. The American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic 
> Frontier
> > Foundation, and a number of internet corporations — including
> > Google, Yahoo!, and AOL — filed briefs on behalf of the defendant
> > arguing that only the originator of a defamatory statement 
> published on
> > the internet could be held liable.
> > 
> > In the majority opinion, Justice Corrigan observed that the plain
> > language of Section 230 shows that "Congress did not intend for an
> > internet user to be treated differently than an internet provider." 
> Both
> > had immunity from liability for the re-publication of defamatory 
> content
> > on the internet.
> > 
> > The court agreed that "subjecting Internet service providers and 
> users
> > to defamation liability would tend to chill online speech."... 
> Moreover,
> > the court agreed with Rosenthal in the interpretation of 
> congressional
> > intent:
> > 
> > The congressional intent of fostering free speech on the internet
> > supported the extension of Section 230 immunity to active individual
> > users. It is they who provide much of the 'diversity of political
> > discourse,' the pursuit of 'opportunities for cultural 
> development,' and
> > the exploration of 'myriad avenues for intellectual activity' that 
> the
> > statute was meant to protect.
> > 
> > ==============================================
> > 
> > In a message dated 9/15/2007 8:47:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > jerseykev@ writes:
> > 
> > NOW LISTEN UP: …the destruction of my reputation. This was a plot
> > ...From now on, anyone who even as much as hints of an impropriety 
> in
> > regard to me ... be certain before you say anything derogatory 
> because I
> > am left with no choice but to protect ... I would caution all 
> you ...
> >
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to