Re: [asdf-devel] Fwd: can't compile-file then load asdf.lisp

2009-07-09 Thread Faré
2009/7/9 Gary King gwk...@metabang.com: If something along the lines is put it, I would suggest that TRT is to signal an error and offer restarts to either delete the package or continue blindly. I agree and it seems that a named restart would allow XCVB function correctly, right? No it

Re: [asdf-devel] Guard against (push /foo/bar asdf:*central-registry*)

2009-07-09 Thread Gary King
How about this: (defun directory-pathname-p (pathname) (and (member (pathname-name pathname) (list nil :unspecified)) (member (pathname-type pathname) (list nil :unspecified (defun sysdef-central-registry-search (system) (let ((name (coerce-name system)) (to-remove

Re: [asdf-devel] Guard against (push /foo/bar asdf:*central-registry*)

2009-07-09 Thread Richard M Kreuter
Tobias C. Rittweiler writes: I think it's bitten pretty much all of us that we at least once tried to push a non-directory-designating filename to *CENTRAL-REGISTRY*. It's a common pitfalls for newcomers. Couldn't ASDF signal a warning when it encounters such a thing while grovelling

Re: [asdf-devel] Guard against (push /foo/bar asdf:*central-registry*)

2009-07-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
Richard M Kreuter writes: Tobias C. Rittweiler writes: I think it's bitten pretty much all of us that we at least once tried to push a non-directory-designating filename to *CENTRAL-REGISTRY*. It's a common pitfalls for newcomers. Couldn't ASDF signal a warning when it encounters