Re: [asdf-devel] DOC-OP

2009-11-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
Tobias C. Rittweiler writes: I think GwKing uses automatically generated documentation for his libraries. Gary, do you use some hook into ASDF for that? In my experience, you always have to toggle a few switches for each project (name, version number, download url, etc), and I'd like to have

Re: [asdf-devel] ASDF test-op question

2009-11-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
This feature request is now logged as https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/479478 -T. ___ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Re: [asdf-devel] recursiveness of :FORCE

2009-11-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
Tobias C. Rittweiler t...@freebits.de writes: When I use :FORCE, in most cases I do want to recompile solely the specified system, not all its dependencies. In my ideal world, :FORCE T would recompile the specified system only, and :FORCE :ALL would recompile it along its dependencies. Of

[asdf-devel] :IMPLEMENTATION keyword for TEST-OP

2009-11-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
I want to run a test suite on an implementation I'm not currently working in. For example, TEST-OP could take an :IMPLEMENTATION argument (with one possible value being :ALL to test all registered implementations -- whatever registered means.) Fare nicely collected sexps describing how to do

[asdf-devel] Recompile if dependent system changed

2009-11-09 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
As far as I'm told (and that matches my experience), ASDF does not recompile the current system if a dependent system changed, unless of course :FORCE T is specified. This is logged as https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/479522 -T. ___