Re: [asdf-devel] ASDF traverse changed behavior?

2010-03-19 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote: Juanjo --- do you have what you need to make asdf-ecl.lisp work again (wrt traverse)? Is there anything we (I) can do to help with this? I am still waiting to get see whether the package changes are fixed -- I messed

[asdf-devel] ASDF works again with ECL (also a question)

2010-03-19 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
Thansk for the latest changes, they work like a charm now. I have done something which I do not know whether it is a desired protocol. Namely I have submitted patches for asdf-ecl.lisp using launchpad. I did this because I always found it more convenient to have a look at the ECL bug/patch

Re: [asdf-devel] ASDF works again with ECL (also a question)

2010-03-19 Thread Faré
On 19 March 2010 13:34, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: Thansk for the latest changes, they work like a charm now. Glad to know it was just a package problem, and thanks to Robert for the diagnostic and to you for the explanation! I'm glad it didn't require

Re: [asdf-devel] ASDF works again with ECL (also a question)

2010-03-19 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: Can you help with the configuration on Windows? What is the ECL equivalent of LispWorks' get-folder-path? Or if there isn't one builtin, how do I read a string entry from the registry? We do not export in ECL any way to read the

[asdf-devel] quick launchpad question

2010-03-19 Thread Robert Goldman
would it be possible to also add a version 3 milestone so that we could explicitly push stuff /out/ of version 2? Right now it seems like there's no way of telling the difference between unmilestoned and milestoned out of version 2. But my ignorance of launchpad is near complete, so it is

[asdf-devel] Minor comments regarding manual on HEAD

2010-03-19 Thread Tobias C. Rittweiler
* README should say how to build the manual * That said, how is the user supposed to build the manual? There does not seem to be any rule for it in the Makefile. * texipdf asdf.texinfo resulted in an error; an asdf.pdf was produced nontheless. See PS for transcript. * the manual should

[asdf-devel] ASDF and source file extensions

2010-03-19 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
In a system such as (defsystem :foo :component ((:file foo))) where foo.lsp exists and is recognized by the lisp implementation as a valid source file (ECL), ASDF imposes the file extension lisp. Furthermore, adding our own extension (defsystem :foo :component ((:file foo.lsp))) does not

Re: [asdf-devel] Minor comments regarding manual on HEAD

2010-03-19 Thread Nikodemus Siivola
On 20 March 2010 01:02, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote: The manual does not build to hardcopy using TeX right now because it has some ampersands in it that confuse TeX.  Googling has not revealed to me how to escape an `'. Put this into the @ifnottex secttion, and use @key, etc. @c