[asdf-devel] Subtle bug fixed in restore-image & dump-image

2013-11-11 Thread Faré
Dear Lisp hackers, I wasted quite some time today with a weird weird bug. I was streamlining the build of Lisp code within Google, which will now use as little of ASDF as possible to take advantage of their massively scalable build system, blaze: http://google-engtools.blogspot.com/2011/08/build-

Re: [asdf-devel] Advanced Configuration

2013-11-11 Thread FAU
Hello Faré, Thanks for your comments. I downloaded asdf-source-in-package.lisp which may provide a good starting point. Thanks, Frank On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 04:01 -0500, Faré wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:40 AM, FAU wrote: > > I'd like to find out if I can do this with ASDF. > > > > (defu

Re: [asdf-devel] Advanced Configuration

2013-11-11 Thread Faré
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:40 AM, FAU wrote: > I'd like to find out if I can do this with ASDF. > > (defun foo () > #+foo1.0 > :foo1.0 > #+foo1.1 > :foo1.1 > ) > > As you can see the behaviour of the fn foo depends on version request > features (which, lets say, represents the API version