I plan to import this into the manual.
... in my copious free time.
Best,
R
On 17 Feb 2019, at 15:01, Florian Margaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:54 PM Robert Dodier
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Robert P. Goldman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Quick response for now: yes,
On 17 Feb 2019, at 14:53, Robert Dodier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Robert P. Goldman
wrote:
Quick response for now: yes, lowercase naming is a requirement.
Hi Robert, thanks for your reply. Got it, no problem. I will adjust my
stuff accordingly.
It would really help a lot if
It's actually there, at least if you are looking for it.
Looking for "lower" I found this, but in the discussion of
`asdf:load-system`, which isn't great placement.
```
Note that the canonical name of a system is a string, conventionally
lowercase.
A system name can also be specified as a
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:54 PM Robert Dodier
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Robert P. Goldman
> wrote:
>
> > Quick response for now: yes, lowercase naming is a requirement.
>
> Hi Robert, thanks for your reply. Got it, no problem. I will adjust my
> stuff accordingly.
>
> It
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Robert P. Goldman wrote:
> Quick response for now: yes, lowercase naming is a requirement.
Hi Robert, thanks for your reply. Got it, no problem. I will adjust my
stuff accordingly.
It would really help a lot if the policy for the name of the system
and the
Another reason is that we allow the programmer to refer to systems with
symbols as well as strings, and symbols are not -- without a substantial
nuisance -- case-sensitive.
I'm afraid you are better off with "solve-solvable2". And avoid
"solve_solvable" because underscores are not legal
Quick response for now: yes, lowercase naming is a requirement. There are a
number of reasons for this, including the fact that CL's logical pathnames are
case-insensitive.
Best,
R
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 01:21, Robert Dodier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The ASDF manual says that
