Re: historical question

2024-02-01 Thread Rudolf Schlatte
Rudolf Schlatte writes: > cage writes: > >> Hi! >> >> Some person (including me) was wondering when the ASDF project >> started; on the fediverse someone guessed that the 25th anniversary >> could be near. Is that true? > > If you need a d

Re: historical question

2024-02-01 Thread Rudolf Schlatte
cage writes: > Hi! > > Some person (including me) was wondering when the ASDF project > started; on the fediverse someone guessed that the 25th anniversary > could be near. Is that true? If you need a definitive answer, you could ask Dan Barlow, he's on the fediverse at

Re: Rejiggering the branches

2021-07-12 Thread Rudolf Schlatte
"Robert Goldman" writes: > If stable seems bad, is there another name we could use to avoid renaming? > Like maint for "maintenance"? > > I don't love maint, because it's too close to main, and it seems like main > has an edge in familiarity if not in meaningfulness. > > legacy? > > Unless we

Re: [asdf-devel] [armedbear-devel] Upgrade issues

2013-01-21 Thread Rudolf Schlatte
On Jan 21, 2013, at 20:08, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: ABCL is one of the three implementations, together with CLISP and CMUCL, where I ultimately punted on ASDF hot-upgrade, by just trying to rename away the ASDF package if it's too old. I don't know if you're interested in making the

Re: [asdf-devel] suggestion for aserve.asd

2012-12-20 Thread Rudolf Schlatte
On Dec 20, 2012, at 03:21, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote: On 12/19/12 Dec 19 -8:04 PM, Faré wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote: You don't need acl-file any more. You can now use cl-source-file.cl, which is exported from ASDF. You