Re: [asdf-devel] Feature Request: Better Error Reporting

2010-09-11 Thread Tobias C Rittweiler
In article 1275145919.15345.10.ca...@seth-laptop, Seth Burleigh s...@tewebs.com wrote: Alright, so this is definitely a bug in something, it is reproducable 100% of the time on sbcl 1.0.38 on ubuntu 10.04 I compile celtk (from here http://github.com/kennytilton/celtk) and it gives me a

Re: [asdf-devel] Feature Request: Better Error Reporting

2010-09-11 Thread Faré
That said, the problem with *COMPILE-FILE-WARNING-BEHAVIOUR* is that it's applied *after* COMPILE-FILE finished; it would be much more intuitive if it failed right at the point a warning is signaled. More intuitive because the message of the warning would not be hidden somewhere in the

Re: [asdf-devel] Feature Request: Better Error Reporting

2010-05-30 Thread Faré
On 30 May 2010 22:00, Seth Burleigh s...@tewebs.com wrote: Here's the problem i found, is it a bug? Place (cffi:defctype Time :unsigned-long) in any asdf file youre loading. It will produce an error on loading after requiring once and then it will load successfully after second require. I

Re: [asdf-devel] Feature Request: Better Error Reporting

2010-05-30 Thread Daniel Herring
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Seth Burleigh wrote: Here's the problem i found, is it a bug? Place (cffi:defctype Time :unsigned-long) in any asdf file youre loading. It will produce an error on loading after requiring once and then it will load successfully after second require. Possible

Re: [asdf-devel] Feature Request: Better Error Reporting

2010-05-30 Thread Faré
Plausible. Seth: can you post on launchpad the error log, and the .asd file, too? Is your code browsable online? [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | ReflectionCybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal. — Henry Ford On