Re: A thing I should know myself....

2018-06-24 Thread Faré
Sorry for a late reply. UIOP has these utilities that can help you: (uiop:find-symbol* :unimplemented-stub :foo nil) (uiop:match-condition-p #(unimplemented-stub foo) (make-condition 'simple-warning)) (setf uiop:*uninteresting-conditions* '(#(unimplemented-stub foo))) Also, ASDF has the around-co

Re: A thing I should know myself....

2018-06-24 Thread Robert Goldman
On 22 Jun 2018, at 23:55, Stas Boukarev wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:13 PM Robert Goldman wrote: I have a library that provides DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED as a macro for defining stub functions. When you compile a file with unimplemented functions, you get a warning of the type FOO:UNIMPLEMENTE

Re: A thing I should know myself....

2018-06-22 Thread Stas Boukarev
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:13 PM Robert Goldman wrote: > I have a library that provides DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED as a macro for defining > stub functions. When you compile a file with unimplemented functions, you > get a warning of the type FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB in my library FOO. > > I'd like to put in

Re: A thing I should know myself....

2018-06-22 Thread Robert Goldman
Not sure why that took 8 days to post... On 14 Jun 2018, at 12:50, Robert Goldman wrote: I have a library that provides `DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED` as a macro for defining stub functions. When you compile a file with unimplemented functions, you get a warning of the type `FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB` in

A thing I should know myself....

2018-06-22 Thread Robert Goldman
I have a library that provides `DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED` as a macro for defining stub functions. When you compile a file with unimplemented functions, you get a warning of the type `FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB` in my library `FOO`. I'd like to put in an asdf system definition a file spec something like