Re: [aspectj-users] Creating a jar file

> If it uses AspectJ, it *does* need the aspectjrt.jar. Yes, and by the way, Marcos: the 'rt' in 'aspectjrt' means 'runtime', becaute the library is needed - you may have guessed already - at runtime. ;-) >> I'm trying to create a jar file from two projects, one java project >> and one aspectj pr

Re: [aspectj-users] Creating a jar file

If it uses AspectJ, it *does* need the aspectjrt.jar. On 2/8/07, Marcos Fábio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to create a jar file from two projects, one java project and one aspectj project, both are projects in the eclipse, and i'm using the AJDT. This jar file doesn't needs

[aspectj-users] Creating a jar file

Hi all, I'm trying to create a jar file from two projects, one java project and one aspectj project, both are projects in the eclipse, and i'm using the AJDT. This jar file doesn't needs the aspectrt,jar, it's right? But when i put the jar file into another project, the aspectjrt.jar is require

Re: [aspectj-users] age-old incremental compile question

It sounds like load-time weaving (LTW) is what you want. You can build normally with eclipse (i.e., using javac), then use the -javaagent option (for java 5) to have the AspectJ weaver weave in your logging aspects. Even your build.xml wouldn't have to change, unless you run the application wit

[aspectj-users] Using args in LTW

Hi, This is a follow-on to my query a couple of days ago about using pointcuts defined in an external file. I guess I was a bit premature in posting. It had been a few months since I had looked at my problems and I should have taken the time to review. So, sorry for the noise. Ok, so here's w

RE: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

See the discussion on bugzilla bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68603 And enhancement request https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=113184 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincenz Braun Sent: Thursday, February 08

Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

Fine, the missing word and a missing j did not made the post useless :-) (So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would expect aspectj not to match null values.) I think a lot of code depends on this "bug" and expects only runtime checks when narrowing the argument type. (e.g. args(.., Sp

Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

On 2/8/07, Vincenz Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So args ha a instanceof semantic and one would aspect null values not to match. Normally, with statically determinable pointcuts this is not the case in aspectj: I would be surprised if this was not a bug. Surely this cannot be intentional.

Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

I would suggest to repost this issue under a new topic. (e.g. args pointcut designature and null arguments). So it is more likely to get a post from the developers. Here you find an older discussion of this topic: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-dev/msg01676.html So args ha a ins

Re: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

But it doesn't seem to work when the Transaction object is null? Is that expected? Yes, because args(v) where v has type T says that the concrete type at runtime of the object that is passed in as argument has to be of type T (or any subtype). null is not of type T. Having said that, stricktly

RE: [aspectj-users] Matching methods with a particular argument type

Hi again, We're getting this to work: pointcut bcMethodsTransactionAfterMethods(Transaction tx): (execution (!private * com.ericsson.nms.cif.cs.*.*(.., Transaction)) && args(.., tx) ); before(Transaction tx): bcMethodsTransactionBeforeMet