Re: [aspectj-users] Is there any performance issue usingthisJoinPoint

2010-12-22 Thread jeanlouis.pasturel
Just another question about the if statement in the pointcut: does the order matter ? before(): execution(* *(..)) && if(GlobalLoggingFlagIsTrue); And before(): if(GlobalLoggingFlagIsTrue) && execution(* *(..)) ; have the same cost, when matching ? Cordialement / Best regards Jean-Louis Pastur

Re: [aspectj-users] runtime library missing

2010-12-22 Thread Johnson, Trace
yes I was, I used springsource which is a cloud version of eclipse and it works beautifully Trace Johnson Senior Admin and Co-owner of FnG Lan Gaming Association of Texas Tech trace.john...@ttu.edu trace.johnson@gmail.com (817)797-3767 From: aspectj-us

Re: [aspectj-users] Is there any performance issue using thisJoinPoint

2010-12-22 Thread Andy Clement
Hi Marko, Yes, there is a cost for building thisJoinPoint objects - elements like the arguments have to be packaged up at the advised site so they can be passed into the advice. On 22 December 2010 08:50, Marko Umek wrote: > So my question is: Using the thisJoinPoint instance already has an impa

[aspectj-users] Is there any performance issue using thisJoinPoint

2010-12-22 Thread Marko Umek
Hi, I've read about performance issues on accessing the join point context (i.e. thisJoinPoint.getArgs()). I'm writing a logging facade and sometimes it's necessary to access the argument list or executing context (getThis). Using of the join point context depends if the log level is appropriate.

Re: [aspectj-users] runtime library missing

2010-12-22 Thread Andrew Eisenberg
I see you raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=333090 Let's continue the discussion on that bug report. @Trace, Were you able to get your program running? On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:35 PM, 412140321 <412140...@qq.com> wrote: > > I am having the same problem: The container 'Aspect