Hi,
In fact ajc does not restrict weaving into the class library, but
the resulting code may break the VM bootstrapping or crash the VM...
For LTW, you could implement your own weaving agent using the
WeavingAdaptor, and use
bcelWorld
.performExtraConfiguration
("weaveJavaPackages=t
Hi,
You can try MAJOR tool which allows you to do exactly that.
http://www.inf.unisi.ch/projects/ferrari/MAJOR.html
Alex
On Jul 22, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Nikolas Nehmer wrote:
Hi there,
I'm new to AOP and AspectJ in particular. Today I started exploring
some
simple HelloWorld style exampl
On Apr 30, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
Alex Villazon wrote:
We're looking for a way to inline advice bodies in woven code...
I'm curious: why? The only reason I could think of is performance,
though
this is a slippery slope.
I also think you could easily blow
Hi,
We're looking for a way to inline advice bodies in woven code...
According to this mail
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg03530.html
the reason for not doing that is modularity.. I agree that you need to
reweave all the code, but isn't there a hidden option to enab
ow describing it
as a pointcut) but probably this is not even possible with SCoPE..
The problem is that our application needs to be very fast, and
computing dyn joinpoints is already introducing too much perturbation..
Probably there is a nicer way to do that...
Alex
--a
On Tue,
Hi,
Is there a mechanism similar to SCoPE
http://www.graco.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ppp/index.php?Projects%2Fscope
implemented (or planned) for AspectJ?
This feature seems to be very useful to avoid heavy runtime tests...
Any comments?
Alex
___
aspec
Hi,
Yes, you can do that.
If you encounter problems (depending which classes of java.util
are woven), you can use MAJOR tool, I announced some minutes ago ;-)
http://www.inf.unisi.ch/projects/ferrari/MAJOR.html
Cheers,
Alex
On Feb 23, 2009, at 5:41 PM, epicwin...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm pleased to announce MAJOR (release 0.5), a new tool for aspect
weaving into the Java Standard Library (aka JDK classes)
http://www.inf.unisi.ch/projects/ferrari/MAJOR.html
MAJOR allows you to weave standard AspectJ aspects into the JDK. It
uses standard AspectJ weaver and c
On Dec 2, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Alex,
What I want to do is to add an interface to some classes. From the
documentation I can see how that's done, but unfortunately I want to
add this interface to about 10 classes fro
On Dec 2, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pretty new to AOP, so please excuse me if this is a FAQ, but at
least I grepped the FAQs and didn't find an answer. :-)
What I want to do is to add an interface to some classes. From the
documentation I can see how that's done, but
Hi,
I want to use the wormhole pattern to make some benchmarks of cflow
using dacapo..
I don't know if there is a generic wormhole that could be applied to
any benchmark, in order to stress the execution of cflow.
I was thinking something similar to this one, i.e. to capture the
worm
On Oct 23, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Mario Mendez-Lojo wrote:
As far as I know, prepending the bootclasspath is the only solution
to
this problem. You don't necessarily have to use the JDK sources, you
can do binary weaving.
I should have said that weaving the bytecode is not allowed either,
since
Hi,
Please check our paper about aspect weaving in the JDK
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1411732.1411754
We are planning a binary demo release within 1 month, and an open
source release in early 2009.
The underlaying instrumentation framework (FERRARI) is described
Hi,
Is it possible to write an aspect that prints a message after a
giving number of recursive invocations.. and warns that there is a
potential infinite recursion?
Or is there any mean to check for example if there is a given
sequence of calls in the control flow?
Can I write a
On Sep 28, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Eric Bodden wrote:
Alex, try the following:
before() : (set(* *) && !cflow(staticinitialization(*))) {
Thanks eric, but I forgot to mention that I'm not allowed to use
cflow :-( because I'm trying to reproduce what cflow does...
I saw old messages, where i
Hi,
I want to capture with before() all get, set, call, but to exclude
those that happen on the body of the s...
I tried with for set
aspect Foo {
before() : (set(* *) && !staticinitialization(*)) && !within(Foo) {
..
}
}
but it does not work.. I can prevent sets and gets by saying
only inside the
'execution' of constructors? Probably with that, I could capture
separately the invocations to this/super, so that I do not need to use
pre-init?
How could I express such a pointcut?
Thanks,
Alex
cheers,
Andy.
2008/9/4 Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<m
Hi,
I would like to execute some code at the very beginning and the end
of every constructor... I'm using preinitialization and after
returning as follows.
public aspect Foo {
pointcut allExecsNews() : execution(*.new(..)) && !
within(Foo) ;
pointcut preInit() : preinitiali
w how it goes...
Many thanks. We will also try to find a solution in our tool to keep
compatibility with standard aspectj.
Cheers,
Alex
cheers,
Andy.
2008/9/3 Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Andy Clement wrote:
Hi Alex,
It is not an optimization,
d to debug :-( and we do not have a
workaround to easily detect such situations... An option to enable
bridge methods to be advised would greatly help. ;-)
Many thanks,
Alex
Andy.
2008/9/3 Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks Andy for the rapid answer.
If I understood we
have 'lost slots' because of the non
advised bridge methods, which are very hard to debug :-(
I'm not sure if enabling advise of bridge methods could benefit
other users but it would be helpful to have such a feature.
Cheers,
Alex
cheers,
Andy.
2008/9/3 Alex Villazon
Dear all,
I have a problem with the following aspect which can advice
methods, depending on how it's compiled...
public class A implements java.util.Comparator {
public int compare(String a, String b) {
return 0;
}
}
javac generated a compare(Object, Object) method corresponding t
java.lang.Comparable
java.lang.CharSequence?
Thanks Andy & Eric,
I was checking the a small (and wrong) subset of JDK classes
without considering the interfaces. Everything should be fine then.
Many thanks again,
Alex
Andy.
2008/8/8 Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 8, 2008,
annotation types, change org/
aspectj/weaver/patterns/DeclareParents.java method
maybeGetNewParent().
As Ron says, it can get ugly.
Andy.
2008/8/8 Alex Villazon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'm trying to add an marker interface to JDK classes... If I use:
declare parents: * &
Hi,
I'm trying to add an marker interface to JDK classes... If I use:
declare parents: * && !java.lang.Object implements myInterface;
then, java.* classes are not woven, which is OK for loadtime weaving
but should be enabled for static weaving...(as we would like also to
weave JDK clas
Hi,
I'm trying to use ITD to add a field only to a direct subclass of a
give class (and not to direct and indirect as aspectj allows by
default), but I cannot find the correct expression to do so. The
problem is that I have to keep a single value for every instance
(ideally I would like t
26 matches
Mail list logo
