Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-11 Thread Simone Gianni
Yupp .. Simone Wim Deblauwe wrote: Yes, thank you guys! 2009/5/10 Ramnivas Laddad > I now see it in the Maven central repository. Thanks Andy, Simone, and Calros for taking care of this. -Ramnivas On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ramniva

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-10 Thread Wim Deblauwe
Yes, thank you guys! 2009/5/10 Ramnivas Laddad > I now see it in the Maven central repository. > > Thanks Andy, Simone, and Calros for taking care of this. > > -Ramnivas > > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ramnivas Laddad > wrote: > > Looks like Carlos Sanchez just fixed this (thanks, Carlos).

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-10 Thread Ramnivas Laddad
I now see it in the Maven central repository. Thanks Andy, Simone, and Calros for taking care of this. -Ramnivas On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ramnivas Laddad wrote: > Looks like Carlos Sanchez just fixed this (thanks, Carlos). > > -Ramnivas > > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ashley Williams

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-09 Thread Ramnivas Laddad
Looks like Carlos Sanchez just fixed this (thanks, Carlos). -Ramnivas On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ashley Williams wrote: > Looks like yes: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repository-tools/trunk/src/bin/synchronize/m2-sync/sync.csv > > Should be picked up automatically by rsync in th

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-09 Thread Ashley Williams
Looks like yes: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repository-tools/trunk/src/bin/synchronize/m2-sync/sync.csv Should be picked up automatically by rsync in the next 24 hours at most. On 9 May 2009, at 21:59, Andrew Eisenberg wrote: I see the issue as Closed/Fixed. Is it? On Sat, May 9,

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-09 Thread Andrew Eisenberg
I see the issue as Closed/Fixed. Is it? On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Wim Deblauwe wrote: > Yes, it does take quite some time. I already voted on the issue and added > links to the now obsolete other requests, but no activity so far. Strange, > because I added upload requests before and they

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-09 Thread Wim Deblauwe
Yes, it does take quite some time. I already voted on the issue and added links to the now obsolete other requests, but no activity so far. Strange, because I added upload requests before and they used to react much faster. regards, Wim 2009/5/9 Ramnivas Laddad > Can everyone on the list (espe

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-05-09 Thread Ramnivas Laddad
Can everyone on the list (especially those who want to/may want to use Maven with AspectJ) please vote for the bug that Simone has added (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2433). Hopefully, it will help in getting attention and a quicker resolution. Thanks. -Ramnivas On Wed, Apr 22, 20

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-22 Thread Simone Gianni
Hi Wim, just a followup to have you and others Maven users up to date. The modified ant script works correctly and uploads artifacts to the rsync repo. It will also be possible to a final user to modify deployment properties to deploy a modified or instable version of ApsectJ to it's own Maven

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-22 Thread Wim Deblauwe
ok, thank you for the effort already! 2009/4/16 Andy Clement > Simone has done the magic for my build script, I just need to find > some time to run it - i will try and do it either today or tomorrow. > > Not much longer Wim ! :) > > Andy. > > 2009/4/16 Wim Deblauwe : > > Any updates on this? >

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-16 Thread Andy Clement
Simone has done the magic for my build script, I just need to find some time to run it - i will try and do it either today or tomorrow. Not much longer Wim ! :) Andy. 2009/4/16 Wim Deblauwe : > Any updates on this? > > 2009/4/7 Simone Gianni >> >> Hi Andy, >> I usually use the maven deploy plug

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-16 Thread Wim Deblauwe
Any updates on this? 2009/4/7 Simone Gianni > Hi Andy, > I usually use the maven deploy plugin to send stuff to repositories, cause > it generates the correct metadata xml files, merging previous ones if > necessary. Your ant script is useful cause it generates also sources and > javadoc jars. C

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Simone Gianni
Hi Andy, I usually use the maven deploy plugin to send stuff to repositories, cause it generates the correct metadata xml files, merging previous ones if necessary. Your ant script is useful cause it generates also sources and javadoc jars. Can you send it to me? I will integrate it with calls

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Andy Clement
Hi Simone, that would be great ! I have already written the Ant scripts that build a repo suitable for syncing (poms/digests/etc) - you can access the already existing repo's for 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 through the jiras I linked to earlier. Either you can build the repos using the Ant scripts with each

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Simone Gianni
If no one raise any objection, I'd like to volunteer to be "unofficial" maintainer of AspectJ on Maven. That means I'll set up an rsync accessible space, upload there AspectJ jars with pom files and the like, ask for it to be added to the list of repositories synced from the main repository, t

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Andy Clement
As before - it is somewhere I can put them such that maven can automatically sync (rsync or svn). I don't have anywhere on the eclipse servers to do this. I'm open to suggestions. The 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 repos are all built ready, but I have to go through the JIRA process to get them in: http://jir

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Simone Gianni
Same here :D What's needed to have AspectJ releases more or less automatically updated on Maven? Simone Wim Deblauwe wrote: I was afraid to ask, but you know I want it too :) regards, Wim 2009/4/5 Olle Hallin > I'm looking forward to seeing 1.6.4 on the

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-06 Thread Wim Deblauwe
I was afraid to ask, but you know I want it too :) regards, Wim 2009/4/5 Olle Hallin > I'm looking forward to seeing 1.6.4 on the central Maven repo! > > Olle > > > 2009/4/3 Thomas M. Hofmann > >> Hi Andy, Andrew, >> >> >> >> I’d like to say thanks for responding so fast and making the incre

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-05 Thread Olle Hallin
I'm looking forward to seeing 1.6.4 on the central Maven repo! Olle 2009/4/3 Thomas M. Hofmann > Hi Andy, Andrew, > > > > I’d like to say thanks for responding so fast and making the incremental > build faster and for you both being so responsive to user requests / > suggestions and feedback.

RE: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-03 Thread Thomas M. Hofmann
Hi Andy, Andrew, I'd like to say thanks for responding so fast and making the incremental build faster and for you both being so responsive to user requests / suggestions and feedback. I'm looking forward to 1.6.5. Regards, Thomas ___ aspectj

[aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.6.4 released

2009-04-02 Thread Andy Clement
I'm very pleased to announce that AspectJ 1.6.4 is now available for download. The 1.6.4 readme details the major changes and can be found here: http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-164.html There are over 70 issues resolved in this release. The readme lists the notable changes wh