e.org] On Behalf Of Ron DiFrango
> Sent: February-09-09 9:05 PM
> To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
>
> One question, is how do you have the EAR Loading setup? I was
> wondering if
> you have it setup to load from the EAR
all of the effort you are putting into this.
>
> Mike
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:aspectj-users-
>> boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Michael Laccetti
>> Sent: February-09-09 6:06 PM
>> To: 'aspectj-users@
lipse.org'
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
>
> I'll give it a shot. (Both turn on debug in debug and verbose in
> staging.)
>
> Mike
> --
> Michael Laccetti
> 416-558-9718
>
> -Original Message-
have that.)
Mike
From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
Sent: February-09-09 4:14 PM
To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + Aspe
gt;
> *From:* aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Andy Clement
> *Sent:* February-09-09 4:14 PM
> *To:* aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> *Subject:* Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
&
oundException:
> com.cryptologic.bsg.aspect.com.cryptologic.bsg.service.impl.EcashPlayerAccountServiceImpl
> not found.
>
> -bash-3.00#
>
>
>
> I restarted the WL server at 15:30 (EST), just to see.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
&
.service.impl.EcashPlayerAccountServiceImpl
not found.
-bash-3.00#
I restarted the WL server at 15:30 (EST), just to see.
Mike
From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
Sent: February-07-09 3:55 PM
To: aspectj-users@eclipse.or
7-09 3:55 PM
To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the log. This is the most relevant bit and seeing a bit more of the
stack reminded me of a problem we
this happens when we deploy to
> production? Ugh.)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Andy Clement
> *Sent:* February-06-09 5:05 PM
>
> *To:* aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> *Sub
)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Andy Clement
> *Sent:* February-06-09 12:43 PM
> *To:* aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> *Subj
he server directory, though.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
> Sent: February-06-09 1:25 PM
> To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2
pectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
Sent: February-06-09 1:25 PM
To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
Oh - one thing - when you say you turned on AspectJ trace - how did you do
that? Did you put -verbose in the weaver o
7;m a noob with AOP. Try not to burn me too much.)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Andy Clement
> *Sent:* February-06-09 12:43 PM
> *To:* aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> *Subj
ry-06-09 12:43 PM
To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
Hi Mike,
Are you confident that
'com.cryptologic.bsg.model.communication.BsgResponseMessage' is on the
classpath and accessible to the weaver? Sometimes, as a 'last
Hi Mike,
Are you confident that
'com.cryptologic.bsg.model.communication.BsgResponseMessage' is on the
classpath and accessible to the weaver? Sometimes, as a 'last resort'
AspectJ tries some of the imported prefixes on the front of types it is
having trouble finding - to see if it can locate it.
I deployed our application to a WebLogic 9.2 cluster, and ran into some
problems. In our development environment, everything worked okay, but in
staging... Not so much. We use the same JDK, and the Spring Agent for LTW.
The application deploys okay, and the REST services function as expected
16 matches
Mail list logo
