Ys !
My bad !
Thank you for the help.
Jean-Louis Pasturel
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Andy Clement
Envoyé : mercredi 9 juillet 2008 09:53
À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ Ant tas
008 19:56
> À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ Ant task bug ?
>
> I just tried to recreate this, but it always just works for me. As
> Andrew says, it would be useful to see the output - and can you run
> ant with "-verbose" (in addition to l
.
Jean-Louis Pasturel
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Andy Clement
Envoyé : mardi 8 juillet 2008 19:56
À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ Ant task bug ?
I just tried to recreate this, but it always just
I just tried to recreate this, but it always just works for me. As
Andrew says, it would be useful to see the output - and can you run
ant with "-verbose" (in addition to leaving verbose switched on the
for the iajc call) - and show the output of that, mine was:
C:\aspectj162-dev\doc\examples\foo
> I join the two outputs ( OK and KO) as Andrew told to me.
I wasn't looking for the class files, but rather the output from the
ant log that describes the targets that were run and their status.
This might hint at what happened.
___
aspectj-users maili
Jean-Louis - does the same thing happen if you just do it from the
command line using ajc with all the same options?
Andy.
2008/7/7 Andrew Eisenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please post the output of running both ant tasks. That will help me
> see what is going on.
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:25
Please post the output of running both ant tasks. That will help me
see what is going on.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Jean-Louis.Pasturel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Eisenberg a écrit :
>
>> Jean-Louis,
>>
>> I'm not exactly sure I understand what you are saying. Is this correct:
>>
Andrew Eisenberg a écrit :
Jean-Louis,
I'm not exactly sure I understand what you are saying. Is this correct:
1. When you run the iajc ant task with a jar on the inpath. the task
runs propertly. But, when you run it with a class folder on the in
path, the task does not run properly.
Yes
Jean-Louis,
I'm not exactly sure I understand what you are saying. Is this correct:
1. When you run the iajc ant task with a jar on the inpath. the task
runs propertly. But, when you run it with a class folder on the in
path, the task does not run properly.
2. Are you saying that the iajc actu
