**** The names, places,etc. I gave here are illustrative only, not necessarily 
the actual events or places. May not have been Orissa, may not be Dantewada,  
may not be Vedanta.





On Aug 17, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Chan Mahanta wrote:

> You are taking the issue too literally Dhruba.
> 
> The point should have been the totally incomparable examples, held up to be 
> similar by Dilip. The scale, the circumstances are impossibly different. One 
> does not even come close to the other.
> 
> Dilip got robbed in Paris, while vacationing. Did he lose his house? His 
> employment, his livelihood? Does this continue to happen to him, unabated? 
> 
> The people in Orissa (?) who lost their land and their livelihoods, never 
> received compensation ( just came to light , 23 yrs. later, but no guarantee 
> of yet receiving any). Having had no relief from the institutions of their 
> state that some continue to wave as 'democratic' , so must be benevolent, 
> just, timely and all things holy, they  took to arms, placing their lives on 
> the line.
> 
> Now compare the two: Dilip's hardships in his Parisian vacation, and 
> Dantewada's indigenous people who lived off their land from time immemorial, 
> losinit  to corporate greed of Vedanta.
> 
> 
> Dilip was right about not having purchased a gun to defend his property. That 
> is because he HAS  his government provide that service. If someone attempted 
> to take a piece of his property , he can go to to the court, and he could get 
> a decision in his life-time, actually much shorter, probably within a year.
> 
> Compare that to the 23 years it took in Dantewada (?) just to be noticed by 
> the high-court, finally.  Did they get help from the police? From civil 
> authorities? Heck NO!
> 
> So do the two compare? Should Dilip have even attempted that  to draw the 
> conclusion he did? 
> 
> Does it look nice :-)?
> 
> 
> You know the answer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:52 AM, Dhruba Jyoti Deka wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> I was robbed in Paris but still haven't bought a gun.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hieun Chang was robbed when he was backing from Kamrup to his place. After 
>> being robbed he was empty with his everything, and sitting on a stone he was 
>> thinking about his mistake. He saw a monkey was fighting with a tiger to 
>> save her childs, and after few minutes the monkey was able to recover from  
>> the tiger. Mr Chang realised, if he could also fight such. Then he went his 
>> place, he thinking about the monkey's fight against the tiger. Reaching his 
>> place, he inventend the martial art and named it Kung Fu. Untill Bruce Lee's 
>> movie Kung was not so popular beyond China region. But now it is world's 
>> most popular martial art. This is the history of invention of Kung Fu.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Did you learn Kung Fu? If not why you do not buy a gun?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> You must have learn something after being robbed.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:12:49 -0700
>>> From: dilipd...@yahoo.com
>>> To: assam@assamnet.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Assam] From ToI/Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: 
>>> Green panel
>>> 
>>> More intelligent question would be why do civilians need guns even  in a 
>>> democracy like USA to do the same? I am all in favor of banning guns for 
>>> civilians  in USA.
>>> Are you an NRA member?
>>> I was robbed in Paris but still haven't bought a gun.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> To: A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world 
>>> <assam@assamnet.org>
>>> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 9:59:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Assam] From ToI/Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: 
>>> Green 
>>> panel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Depends on how badly one is affected, robbed ? 
>>> 
>>> But the intelligent question should have been: WHY do Indians , in their 
>>> DEMOCRATIC country, have to take to guns, before their grievances see the 
>>> light 
>>> of day, much less a fair and timely resolution? 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Or is that too complicated?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 16, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Dilip Deka wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Guns make a difference anywhere in the world. Doe it mean every civilian 
>>>> must 
>>>> have a gun to make a point?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world 
>>>> <assam@assamnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 9:50:19 PM
>>>> Subject: [Assam] From ToI/Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: Green 
>>> panel
>>>> 
>>>> So it proves one thing LOUD and CLEAR:  That unless you take up arms to 
>>>> defend 
>>> 
>>>> your rights in India, nothing happens. Desi demokrasy is all but impotent 
>>>> to 
>>>> guarantee  the rights of people. But when they take up arms,  Dilli does 
>>>> notice, 
>>>> 
>>>> don't they? Except that some of our kharkhowa ex-pats still can't  fathom 
>>>> it. I 
>>>> 
>>>> wonder WHY these were NOT illegal so far? Naxalism does make the 
>>>> difference for 
>>>> 
>>>> the people after all. 
>>>> 
>>>> cm
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: Green panel
>>>> 
>>>> Read more: Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: Green panel - India 
>>>> Business - Business - The Times of India 
>>>> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Vedanta-mines-illegal-must-be-shut-down-Green-panel/articleshow/6321872.cms#ixzz0wpMAIbWX
>>>> X
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> NEW DELHI: 
>>>> Mining giant Vedanta consistently violated several laws in bauxite mining 
>>>> at 
>>>> Niyamgiri,  encroached upon government land,  got clearances on the basis 
>>>> of 
>>>> false information and illegally built its aluminium refinery at Lanjigarh, 
>>>>  
>>>> Orissa. As the company engaged in these violations,  the Orissa government 
>>>> colluded with it and the Centre turned a blind eye. , These are some of 
>>>> the 
>>>> findings of the four-member N C Saxena committee,  which on Monday 
>>>> recommended 
>>> 
>>>> that the company not be allowed to mine in the hills that are the abode of 
>>>> the 
>>> 
>>>> Dongaria Kondh and Kutia Kondh tribes in Orissa. , The no-holds-barred 
>>>> indictment of the state and private sector in the $1.7billion project 
>>>> brings 
>>>> out 
>>>> 
>>>> the short shrift given to concerns about tribal rights and environmental 
>>>> protection. It is significant also because it underlines the changed 
>>>> sensibilities of the government towards the issues against the backdrop of 
>>>> Left-wing extremism and why Naxalites are finding it easy to influence 
>>>> alienated 
>>>> 
>>>> tribal belts. , The stern report of the environment and forests ministry 
>>>> panel 
>>> 
>>>> signalled that tribal rights and environmental isssues have finally 
>>>> muscled 
>>>> their way onto the governance agenda,  forcing the authorities to take 
>>>> action 
>>>> against corporates who may have shown disregard for rules. The Saxena 
>>>> committee 
>>>> 
>>>> report,  which could lead to shutting down of the Vedanta smelters in 
>>>> Orissa,  
>>> 
>>>> comes after the MoEF moved to stop or stall several high-profile,  
>>>> heavy-investment projects,  including the Posco Integrated Steel project 
>>>> in 
>>>> Orissa,  which,  at Rs 56, 000 crore is the single-largest foreign direct 
>>>> investment in India,  the Jindal thermal power plant in Chhattisgarh (Rs 
>>>> 10,000 
>>>> 
>>>> crore),  hydroelectric projects on Bhagirathi in Uttarakhand and the Navi 
>>>> Mumbai 
>>>> 
>>>> airport in Maharashtra (Rs 7,972 crore). , The panel was set up by the 
>>>> ministry 
>>>> 
>>>> of environment and forests to investigate if the state government and the 
>>>> aluminium giant had complied with the Forest Rights Act and Forest 
>>>> Conservation 
>>>> 
>>>> Act while mining for bauxite. , The report reveals exhaustive evidence to 
>>>> nail 
>>> 
>>>> the complicity of the state government in permitting Vedanta to flagrantly 
>>>> violate the laws. , But the committee,  even as it recommended that the 
>>>> mining 
>>> 
>>>> project be disallowed,  stopped short of asking for prosecution of the 
>>>> officials 
>>>> 
>>>> involved in what seems to be a blatant fraud that went unchecked for 
>>>> years. , 
>>>> "The question of whom to prosecute is secondary. First, we have to 
>>>> consider the 
>>>> 
>>>> clearance," said Union minister for enviroment and forests Jairam Ramesh. 
>>>> Asked 
>>>> 
>>>> if the violations could be set right now,  the minister said,  "Without 
>>>> prejudice to the existing case, it would be a tragedy that one violates 
>>>> laws 
>>>> and 
>>>> 
>>>> still has a window of opportunity to just pay a penalty and get away with 
>>>> it 
>>>> later." , The report will now be reviewed by the statutory Forest Advisory 
>>>> Committee,  which will then give its recommendations to the ministry to 
>>>> take a 
>>> 
>>>> final call on the forest clearance. , The report says,  "This committee is 
>>>> of 
>>>> the firm view that allowing mining in the proposed mining lease area by 
>>>> depriving two primitive tribal groups of their rights over the proposed 
>>>> mining 
>>> 
>>>> area in order to benefit a private company would shake the faith of tribal 
>>>> people in the laws of the land which may have serious consequences for the 
>>>> security and well-being of the entire country." , The report records how 
>>>> the 
>>>> state government falsified documents and concealed information from the 
>>>> central 
>>>> 
>>>> government to facilitate the aluminium refinery in mining bauxite while 
>>>> the 
>>>> company encroached upon government and tribal lands with impunity. , The 
>>>> aluminium czar Anil Aggarwal's company has illegally -- despite legal 
>>>> notices 
>>>> from the Orissa State Pollution Control Board -- begun building a refinery 
>>>> to 
>>>> produce 6 million tonnes of aluminium per annum instead of the 1 million 
>>>> tonnes 
>>>> 
>>>> per annum plant that it had got the green clearance for. , The committee 
>>>> -- 
>>>> that 
>>>> 
>>>> included S Parasuraman,  director of Tata Institute of Social Sciences; 
>>>> Promode 
>>>> 
>>>> Kant,  retired forest official; and Amita Baviskar,  professor at the 
>>>> Institute 
>>>> 
>>>> of Economic Growth -- pointed out how right from the beginning,  the firm 
>>>> had 
>>>> furnished falsified reports to the Centre to seek clearance,  and how the 
>>>> state 
>>>> 
>>>> officials ranging from the highest bureaucrats to the collectors of two 
>>>> districts either refused to enforce existing laws or simply colluded with 
>>>> the 
>>>> company to deny the tribals right over their lands., Read more: Vedanta 
>>>> mines 
>>>> illegal,  must be shut down: Green panel - India Business - Business - The 
>>>> Times 
>>>> 
>>>> of India 
>>>> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Vedanta-mines-illegal-must-be-shut-down-Green-panel/articleshow/6321872.cms#ixzz0wpLtMGod
>>>> d
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>                                        
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam@assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> 


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to