Chandan
I might as well divulge the truth. I happened to read in a very
confidential document about what the Government thought about Phizo at the time.
It is on that basis I made my remark. It was so many years ago. In fact he was
taken aback. He took me in confidence as well.
It was a
Chandan
I am not replying to the rest of the points you've raised. I think it is
not worth responding to.
Bhuban
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
, February 12, 2006 9:52
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland
Chandan
I might as well divulge the truth. I happened to read in a very
confidential document about what the Government thought about Phizo at the
time. It is on that basis I made my remark
Dear Baruah Saheb
You’ve asked my views about the Naga problem. I do
have them coupled with the fact that my political forecasts had always been
proved wrong in the long run. I console myself with the fact that political
solutions are seldom predictable. An example of this is the grant of
essay on the whole thing highlighting the main events.?
Rajen
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:36
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland
In a message dated 11/02/2006 20:41:31 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From day one they had been telling that
they donot want to stay with India. Accord has been signed that after ten
yearsof independence, they can choose what they want. And they choose
rification of the myththat India never attacked another country. RB- Original Message - From: umesh sharma To: Barua25 ; assam@assamnet.org Sent:
Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical Background of Nagaland Native American historyfor that mat
Message -
From:
umesh
sharma
To: Rajen Barua ; assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:25
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland - apology for conquests?
Rajen-da.
I do not know that you subscribe to myths. Anyone who has read Indian
for that matter Sardar Patel is credited with the liberation of Rajasthan - many of whose kingdoms did not want to join India or the case of Junagarh, Hyderabadand Goa - which had to be annexed. California was annexed by USA from Spain- if my history is correct. Why not give the whole
is is just a clarification of the
myththat India never attacked another country.
RB
- Original Message -
From:
umesh
sharma
To: Barua25 ; assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:24
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland Native Americ
Dear Barua Saheb
I wonder who is the author of this account. This does not appear to be the
whole truth. As far as I know there were a few properly British administered
districts except theTuensang area, which was described as partially
administered.
I also find it odd that there was no
k and senseless ' part of India's history."
Please let us know briefly what do you
think is the whole story.
Rajen
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:39
PM
Subject: Re
There is a myth being
circulatedthat India is a country which never invaded other country. This
is however is not true. In case of Nagaland, India definitely invaded the
country. The Naga's, who time and time again have made it
known to both former colonizer Britain and newly emerging
13 matches
Mail list logo
