Re: How to display content of an address that point to a struct

2012-01-08 Thread Chris Mason
My first attempt to post this rebuttal was rejected because it was too long. Proper appreciation of the nonsensical nature of Mr Thigpen's ridiculous post can be appreciated only with reference to most of the previous posts. I suggest reading the archive if you have any doubts over my correct inte

Re: Lacunæ

2012-01-08 Thread robin
From: "John Gilmore" Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 1:27 PM There were once a number of ligatures in wide use, but æ|Æ and œ|Œ are the only ones still in significant current use, particularly in modern French and classical Latin. As well as those, 1/8, 3/8, 5/8, and 7/8 (as single characters,

Re: FLOATING-POINT

2012-01-08 Thread robin
From: "glen herrmannsfeldt" Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 11:31 AM (snip, someone wrote) o IBM hexadecimal floating-point, HFP, o ANSI binary floating-point, BFP, and o ANSI decimal floating-point, DFP. Of these the first two, HFP and BFP, make zeros positive; but the third, DFP, sup

Re: EODAD mystery

2012-01-08 Thread Ron Hesketh
Hi Steve, Sorry I pressed send too soon ... I think program B has to update the DCB with its own EODAD address which exists in program B. Quoting an old MVS /XA data Administration Guide "The EODAD routine is not a subroutine,but rather a continuation of the routine that issue

Re: EODAD mystery

2012-01-08 Thread Ron Hesketh
Hi Steve, I think program B has to update the DCB with its own EODAD address which exists in program B. Regards, Ron From: Steve Comstock To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Date: 09/01/2012 09:28 AM Subject:EODAD mystery Sent by:IBM Mainframe Assembler List

Re: EODAD mystery - problem solved

2012-01-08 Thread Steve Comstock
Ah! When your EODAD takes you to another CSECT, you have to re-establish the base for that CSECT because you enter the CSECT with the other registers unchanged. Found a simpler way to set the bit in PROGRAM A using IILL then STC in PROGRAM B and all works. Subtle bug, though. On 1/8/2012 6:56

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread John Gilmore
There were once a number of ligatures in wide use, but æ|Æ and œ|Œ are the only ones still in significant current use, particularly in modern French and classical Latin. The important thing to remember about such ligatures is that they are single SBCS values having just one eight-bit code point/r

Re: FORTRAN II functions

2012-01-08 Thread John Gilmore
| What is x'8000 ' interpreted as HFP? It does not occur as the result of an in-line or library-subroutine operation, both of which are coerced to be x'_', a 2C poositive zero. What happens when this value is made to figure in an arithmetic operation using EQUIVALENCE or one of the p

Re: EODAD mystery

2012-01-08 Thread Sam Siegel
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Steve Comstock wrote: > I think I may be missing something here, but I can't > pin it down. > > Program A contains DCB/DCBE for a file; the DCBE has > EODAD=ENDIFILE > > The routine called ENDIFILE contains just this: > > oiy flags,endInfile > brr14 > > >

EODAD mystery

2012-01-08 Thread Steve Comstock
I think I may be missing something here, but I can't pin it down. Program A contains DCB/DCBE for a file; the DCBE has EODAD=ENDIFILE The routine called ENDIFILE contains just this: oiy flags,endInfile brr14 Program A opens the file and later links (linkx) to Program B, passin

Re: FORTRAN II functions

2012-01-08 Thread glen herrmannsfeldt
(snip, someone wrote) > o IBM hexadecimal floating-point, HFP, > o ANSI binary floating-point, BFP, and > o ANSI decimal floating-point, DFP. > Of these the first two, HFP and BFP, make zeros positive; but the > third, DFP, supports both positive and negative zeros. The change to the Fortran s

Re: FORTRAN II functions

2012-01-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Jan 7, 2012, at 19:42, John Gilmore wrote: > > o IBM hexadecimal floating-point, HFP, > > o ANSI binary floating-point, BFP, and > > o ANSI decimal floating-point, DFP. > > Of these the first two, HFP and BFP, make zeros positive; but the > third, DFP, supports both positive and negative zeros.

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Andreas Geissbuehler
Original Message Michael McCawley My presumption (based on previous discussions) is that "lacunć" may be an alternate presentation of "lancune" Non, pas du tout! This word gets an 's' slapped on the end but nothing above. This code page crap has caused *me* grief time and again and no end in si

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Michael McCawley
So far as the character source language for "ć", if intended, it would appear to be Slavic (Polish or Serbo-Croatian?) in origin, though seldom (never?) used as an ending consonant. http://www.unilang.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=23605 Enjoy -Original Message- From: Paul Gilmartin Sent:

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Andreas Geissbuehler
On Jan 8, 2012, at 14:19, Tony Harminc wrote: But a day or two ago, I encountered the surprising word "lacunć" in his comment on programming languages and their apologists: Mystery solved, I got lucky on that one. I thought he dipped into French vocabulary for a more eloquent explanation and r

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Michael McCawley
My presumption (based on previous discussions) is that "lacunć" may be an alternate presentation of "lancune" (Fr. an inadvertent or indolent omission, e.g. a gap in a book, something left out) in this context possibly a language or compiler design that is simplified by a truncation of function (P

Re: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:55 PM, John P. Baker wrote: > Tony, > > On my system it appeared as "lacunae", which is a term used to indicate a > cavity or depression, or in this context, an omission in the design. More precisely, the plural of "lacuna" with the ligature "ae" as Tony himself already

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread John Gilmore
I have no idea how lacunae in ligature form was corrupted, but I do have something to say about '[for though thou hadst] small Latin and less Greek'. The phrase not insulting. It is not even remotely pejorative. It is Ben Jonson's, used in a proem to the first Shakespeare quarto; and about Shake

RE: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread John P. Baker
Tony, On my system it appeared as "lacunae", which is a term used to indicate a cavity or depression, or in this context, an omission in the design. Code set differences? John P. Baker -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Be

Re: OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Jan 8, 2012, at 14:19, Tony Harminc wrote: > > But a day or two ago, I encountered the surprising word "lacunć" in > his comment on programming languages and their apologists: > IIRC, he may have said "lacunæ" and some mail agent corrupted it. First, be sure you haven't disabled MIME headers i

OT: Lacunć

2012-01-08 Thread Tony Harminc
John Gilmore's vocabulary and education impress many of us, and while a few complain that he is showing off, I am sure that he wishes at most to hold the rest of us to a high standard, and provide useful examples in passing. With my - as he quite rightly points out - "small Latin and less Greek", I

Re: How to display content of an address that point to a struct

2012-01-08 Thread Tony Thigpen
Yanick, Just ignore the tone of Chris' email. It's not personal. He is the exception to the rule. Most people here are nice and are willing to provide answers to your questions without the belittling normally found in Chris' replies. He knows a lot, but just does not know how to convey it in an n

Re: How to display content of an address that point to a struct

2012-01-08 Thread Tony Thigpen
Yanic, If you don't want to walk the pointers yourself, just call EZACIC08. Although it's intended to help with HLL's like Cobol, it can also be called from Assembler. Tony Thigpen -Original Message - From: Yanick Jacques Sent: 01/05/2012 01:30 PM I'm avancing in my developpement,now