Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread Mike Shaw
Thank you Peter. Mike Shaw MVS/QuickRef Support Group Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Peter Relson wrote: > >Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that > does > >not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread retired mainframer
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 6:02 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: CSRSIIDF Question > > >Because some of the return codes indicate

Re: CSRSIIDF Question

2016-07-02 Thread Peter Relson
>Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that does >not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand upgrade >was performed since the last time that same program executed? Not that comes to mind. And, in fact, the operating system has no idea that