On 14 December 2017 at 08:17, Windt, W.K.F. van der (Fred) <
0782fe4a8c02-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote:
> > It surprises me that no one has pointed out that having complex tables
> > assembled/compiled into a program is generally a Bad Idea. Almost always
> > such tables have to be up
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Script is Turing complete, so in a pinch you can do things that you don't
> normally think of as document processing, e.g., generating backup
> schedules. I much prefer a good markup language to a WYSIAYG word
> processor. Take m$ office -
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:26:51 -0500, Melvyn Maltz wrote:
>For some reason my recent posting is going into Spam or
>(in my case) being rejected as Spam before I get it
If I understand correctly, you are saying that you have REPRO set,
so that you receive your own postings, and that when your post
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the response
Yes, whatever I have set, I get everyone's posting including my own
When I posted the original "HLASM RFE revisited" I was surprised when I
didn't receive the posting sent back to me and also that no-one had
responded
I found that my Email client had rejected
On 12/14/2017 12:03 PM, MELVYN MALTZ wrote:
Did you receive the original post ? If not...why ?
Irrelevant. Every spam filter is unique. Your experience with your
particular spam filter is unique to you on no one else...
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive Nor
Every Spam filter is not only unique, it's reaction to any given email can vary
from moment to moment.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 12:06 PM
> To: ASSEMBLER-L
Thanks to Ed and Dave
But did you get the original posting...you didn't say
If you thought it too trivial/irrelevant to respond to...that's fine
But if you didn't get it, that's not fine
Melvyn.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Jaffe"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 8:05 PM
Su
Honestly, I have no recollection...
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of MELVYN MALTZ
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 12:34 PM
> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Posting
>
> Thanks to Ed an
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:03:23 -, MELVYN MALTZ wrote:
>Did you receive the original post ? If not...why ?
No. I don't receive any posts because I am set to NOMAIL.
I read posts through the web interface.
--
Tom Marchant
Sorry for taking so long to respond. A little too busy.
>John Ehrman wrote: I agree that PL/I's macro preprocessor is indeed powerful;
>but it and > all other macro facilities I know of lack a key feature of
>HLASM's
> conditional assembly and macro facility:
John is being modest by hugely
10 matches
Mail list logo
