Re: SV: Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2018-02-19, at 09:53:00, Willy Jensen wrote: > Install the PDS86 program from CBTTAPE.ORG file 182. It has some very nice > member filter options, and can run as a batch TSO program. Listing > loadmodules would be the ATTR : SHORT command. > For PDSE members FileAccessMethodService (FAMS) m

SV: Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Willy Jensen
Install the PDS86 program from CBTTAPE.ORG file 182. It has some very nice member filter options, and can run as a batch TSO program. Listing loadmodules would be the ATTR : SHORT command. Willy -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UG

Re: Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Jake Anderson
Thanks i to need to take a result of 1000 modules. On 19-Feb-2018 9:56 PM, "Dougie Lawson" wrote: > Use AMBLIST. > > On 19 February 2018 at 16:18, Jake Anderson > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > We do not have a tool to see the modified stamp time stamp of a load > > module. > > > > Is there a way to

Re: Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Dougie Lawson
Use AMBLIST. On 19 February 2018 at 16:18, Jake Anderson wrote: > Hi > > We do not have a tool to see the modified stamp time stamp of a load > module. > > Is there a way to know ? > > Jake > -- http://twitter.com/DougieLawson

Re: Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Mike Shaw
​LISTIDR control statement of AMBLIST utility will do it. Mike Shaw MVS/QuickRef Support Group Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Jake Anderson wrote: > Hi > > We do not have a tool to see the modified stamp time stamp of a load > module. > > Is there a way to know ? > > Jake

Last modified timestamp of a module

2018-02-19 Thread Jake Anderson
Hi We do not have a tool to see the modified stamp time stamp of a load module. Is there a way to know ? Jake

Re: BPXWDYN - Bug or no bug ?

2018-02-19 Thread Keven
Maybe drop the REUSE directive on the alloc call? Keven Hall On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:19 AM -0600, "Gary Freestone" wrote: Sorry guys. Wrong forum. Apo

Re: BPXWDYN - Bug or no bug ?

2018-02-19 Thread Gary Freestone
Sorry guys. Wrong forum. Apologies. Gary Freestone -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Gary Freestone Sent: Tuesday, 20 February 2018 12:04 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: BPXWDYN - Bug or no bug ?

BPXWDYN - Bug or no bug ?

2018-02-19 Thread Gary Freestone
These days we are opting for BPXWDYN in our REXXs instead of TSO ALLOC. One of the main reason for the switch is BPXWDYN's ability to return the DDNAME it allocated via the RTDDN parameter. Chasing down a bug in my code lead me to discover an idiosyncrasy with BPXWDYN that I think is a bug, bu