Dependent USING Does Not Work as Documented

2018-04-22 Thread Ed Jaffe
HLASM Mavens, https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.asma400/depuse.htm discusses dependent USINGs. The syntax is as follows: >>-+-+-USING-+-base-+-,address-><    +-label---+   '-(base-+--+-)-'    '-sequence_

Re: Dependent USING Does Not Work as Documented

2018-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
And if you make the filler X'4000' rather than X'8000', then it assembles without error? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:59 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Re: Dependent USING Does Not Work as Documented

2018-04-22 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 4/22/2018 7:45 PM, Charles Mills wrote: And if you make the filler X'4000' rather than X'8000', then it assembles without error? Haha! Indeed ... or I would not have posted! This post is, of course, a simplified illustration of the problem. The real world case that brought this to light d

Re: Dependent USING Does Not Work as Documented

2018-04-22 Thread Charles Mills
> or I would not have posted! Well, I've seen dumber questions. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:57 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Dependent

Re: Dependent USING Does Not Work as Documented

2018-04-22 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 4/22/2018 8:20 PM, Charles Mills wrote: or I would not have posted! Well, I've seen dumber questions. Haha! So have I, but this is *ME* we're talking about! Just saying... LOL -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 http://www.phoeni