Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57)

2014-03-28 Thread Pieter Wiid
% of a CP. Pieter Wiid -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of John Walker Sent: 28 March 2014 16:07 To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57) Wow

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57)

2014-03-28 Thread Ray Mansell
On 3/28/2014 12:35, Ze'ev Atlas wrote: So yes, your Assembler took 3 seconds vs. 3 hours, but how mainainable it is by people other that you? The maintainability (or otherwise) of code has little to do with the specific language in which it is written, but rather in how *well* it was written *

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57)

2014-03-28 Thread Ze'ev Atlas
I know, it's frustrating not having your way, buddy, but time to accept facts.  These are facts. On Thu, 3/27/14, Automatic digest processor wrote: Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57) To: "Recipients of ASSEMB

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57)

2014-03-28 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Pieter Wiid wrote: > John, you forget to mention that said 3-hour Rexx job would also have > hogged > a CP for the entire time, preventing anybody else from getting an innings. > > I had a similar experience (I did NOT do the Rexx). Job ran every 10 > minutes, an

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57)

2014-03-28 Thread John Walker
dy, but time to accept facts. These are facts. On Thu, 3/27/14, Automatic digest processor wrote: Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Mar 2014 to 27 Mar 2014 (#2014-57) To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" Date: Thursday,