Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-12-10, at 14:31:41, Mike Shaw wrote: > > ASMA032E Relocatable value or unresolved symbol found when absolute value > required > > Explanation: One of the following has occurred: > > o A relocatable or complex relocatable expression is used where an >absolute expression is

Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-10 Thread Robin Vowels
From: "Mike Shaw" Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 8:31 AM I know adcons are relocatable in the sense that they are resolved to a virtual storage address when the load module is loaded and executed; The value of the actual address is determined at program load time, when

Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-10 Thread Mike Shaw
-- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Mike Shaw > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 10:34 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal) > > Adcons cannot refer to relocatable expressions. >

Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-10 Thread Charles Mills
Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 10:34 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal) Adcons cannot refer to relocatable expressions.

Re: Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-10 Thread Mike Shaw
Adcons cannot refer to relocatable expressions. On Dec 10, 2017 12:37 PM, "Paul Gilmartin" < 0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote: On 2017-12-09, at 15:20:59, John Ehrman wrote: > A literal is implicitly a symbolic address and a constant-generation request; nesting those

Adcon (was: Address of a Literal)

2017-12-10 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-12-09, at 15:20:59, John Ehrman wrote: > A literal is implicitly a symbolic address and a constant-generation request; > nesting those functions in other expressions was considered a bit too much > extra work for ASMH, from which HLASM was derived. And there were no strong > requests