I was assuming that there's already a macro or function call that handles
accesses to the common storage and that a modification of same would be
required in order to have a recovery environment established.
Also, the statement regarding accessing page-protected storage seems to imply
that pag
>You could possibly page-protect the storage and use a recovery routine
>to drive the table storage monitoring and/or read/write functionality.
'fraid not, since there is no way to have *your* recovery routine in place
for *their* work unit that is doing the accessing.
FWIW, if someone is truly
You could possibly page-protect the storage and use a recovery routine to drive
the table storage monitoring and/or read/write functionality. Easier than
rewiring PER or rolling your own OS.
Keven
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 07:39, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> It is not possible to monitor someone's ref
It is not possible to monitor someone's references to your or anyone
else's storage (unless you write your own operating system and use the PER
architecture and you're only interested in stores, or you simulate every
instruction).
If you control accesses by some service, then I would say that t
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:29:24 -0500 Scott Ford wrote:
:>All,
:>
:>We in our product build a cache area in Subpool 231. It is build using a
:>standard
:>'Storage Obtain' and use a token to anchor it. I need to monitor the usage.
:>I am not sure if I can without disturbing it. Am I correct in this
:
ms Performance, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Scott Ford
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: 03/03/2016 21:31
Subject: CSA M
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Yeah both we have a assembler routine that reads the subpool entries (
> all that are there ) into a large array/table.
> But I have customers nervous that cant tell how much is in use or whats in
> the subpool.
>
​Well, I gue
Hey John,
Yeah both we have a assembler routine that reads the subpool entries (
all that are there ) into a large array/table.
But I have customers nervous that cant tell how much is in use or whats in
the subpool.
So thats my situation, I figure dataspace is better. Our exits feed the
RACF
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
> All,
>
> We in our product build a cache area in Subpool 231. It is build using a
> standard
> 'Storage Obtain' and use a token to anchor it. I need to monitor the usage.
> I am not sure if I can without disturbing it. Am I correct in this
> as
All,
We in our product build a cache area in Subpool 231. It is build using a
standard
'Storage Obtain' and use a token to anchor it. I need to monitor the usage.
I am not sure if I can without disturbing it. Am I correct in this
assumption ?
Scott
10 matches
Mail list logo
