Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-20 Thread Jonathan Scott
Ref: Your note of Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:01:28 -0600 gil writes: > On 2020-03-20, at 05:32:28, Jonathan Scott wrote: > > > > Further testing has revealed that this test case fails on every > > release of HLASM we have here back to HLASM 1.2 from around 1995. > > So the good news for us is that the c

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2020-03-20, at 05:32:28, Jonathan Scott wrote: > > Further testing has revealed that this test case fails on every > release of HLASM we have here back to HLASM 1.2 from around 1995. > So the good news for us is that the current team did not break > it, but the bad news is that the original imp

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-20 Thread Ian Worthington
Thanks Jonathan, much appreciated. Still waiting on access approval to raise an official report for you. Ian On Friday, March 20, 2020, 11:38:10 AM GMT, Jonathan Scott wrote: Ref:  Your note of Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:58:43 + Jonathan Scott wrote: > The problem occurs on the target ins

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-20 Thread Jonathan Scott
Ref: Your note of Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:58:43 + Jonathan Scott wrote: > The problem occurs on the target instruction of a forward > conditional assembly branch, and appears to suggest that the > wrong ICTL setting is being used when lookahead processing is > used in open code to skip ahead to f

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-18 Thread Jonathan Scott
Ref: Your note of Wed, 18 Mar 2020 15:47:13 + Ian Worthington writes > However, when I set an ICTL of 1,79,2 and COPY in a member > which works perfectly well without the ICTL, all hell breaks > loose, with parts of the seqno being inserted into the text > body. I think you lost the battle t

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-18 Thread Ian Worthington
Source is properly formatted here: ictl confusion | | | | | | | | | | | ictl confusion The HLASM LangRef is very explicit and clear about the effect of the ICTL instruction on the COPY members, viz: ... | | | On Wednesday, March 18, 2020, 03:54:38 PM GMT, Ian Worthingto

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-18 Thread Ian Worthington
Curses.  These have been line-wrapped into oblivion.  How do I stop the listserv doing that? i On Wednesday, March 18, 2020, 03:50:59 PM GMT, Ian Worthington <0c9b78d54aea-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote:

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-18 Thread Ian Worthington
LISTING:===-  Loc  Object Code    Addr1 Addr2  Stmt   Source Statement                                  HLASM R6.0  2020/03/18 13.41 0                                      1  ictl 1,79,2                                                                     ...    -                           

Re: ICTL breaks COPY members?

2020-03-18 Thread Ian Worthington
The HLASM LangRef is, as far as I can see, very explicit and clear about the effect of the ICTL instruction on the COPY members, viz: COPY Instruction: The ICTL instruction does not affect the format of statements brought in by a COPY instruction or generated from a library macro definition. T