AW: Re: Posting

2017-12-16 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>But did you get the original posting...you didn't say I just looked and found your post in the deleted mails folder. So it got through. It may help to add the mail servers address to your address book. Spam filters usually consider mail from addresses it finds in the address b

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:03:23 -, MELVYN MALTZ wrote: >Did you receive the original post ? If not...why ? No. I don't receive any posts because I am set to NOMAIL. I read posts through the web interface. -- Tom Marchant

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread Gibney, Dave
Honestly, I have no recollection... > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of MELVYN MALTZ > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 12:34 PM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Posting

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread MELVYN MALTZ
Thanks to Ed and Dave But did you get the original posting...you didn't say If you thought it too trivial/irrelevant to respond to...that's fine But if you didn't get it, that's not fine Melvyn. - Original Message - From: "Ed Jaffe" <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com> To:

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread Gibney, Dave
; To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Posting > > On 12/14/2017 12:03 PM, MELVYN MALTZ wrote: > > Did you receive the original post ? If not...why ? > > Irrelevant. Every spam filter is unique. Your experience with your particular > spam filter is unique to

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 12/14/2017 12:03 PM, MELVYN MALTZ wrote: Did you receive the original post ? If not...why ? Irrelevant. Every spam filter is unique. Your experience with your particular spam filter is unique to you on no one else... -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread MELVYN MALTZ
Hi Tom, Thanks for the response Yes, whatever I have set, I get everyone's posting including my own When I posted the original "HLASM RFE revisited" I was surprised when I didn't receive the posting sent back to me and also that no-one had responded I found that my Email

Re: Posting

2017-12-14 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:26:51 -0500, Melvyn Maltz wrote: >For some reason my recent posting is going into Spam or >(in my case) being rejected as Spam before I get it If I understand correctly, you are saying that you have REPRO set, so that you receive your own postings, and that whe

Posting

2017-12-13 Thread Melvyn Maltz
For some reason my recent posting is going into Spam or (in my case) being rejected as Spam before I get it It isn't Spam and is a topic for further discussion The Posting is called: HLASM RFE revisited Posted on: 11th Dec @ 09:36 It can be found on the listserv website Perhaps the moderator

Test Posting

2013-01-29 Thread John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-)
Test: I haven't seen any postings for weeks, and can't believe that the list has been inactive for that long. Pardon the added noise. John Ehrman

Re: Test Posting

2013-01-29 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 29 January 2013 01:06, John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-) ehr...@vnet.ibm.com wrote: Test: I haven't seen any postings for weeks, and can't believe that the list has been inactive for that long. Pardon the added noise. John Ehrman There was stuff a week ago. Guess we're all preparing