Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:21 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction.
On Mon, 26 Nov
It's the holiday season. So be nice.
There currently exist 2 execute variants. The old base+displacement and the new
relative. Now that we have 64 bit registers, why not have an RR instruction
where the first register the modifying value but the second register contains
the actual instruction
on a new execute instruction.
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
It's the holiday season. So be nice.
There currently exist 2 execute variants. The old base+displacement and the
new relative. Now that we have 64 bit registers, why not have an RR
and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Robert Ngan
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:01 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction
@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction.
It's the holiday season. So be nice.
There currently exist 2 execute variants. The old base+displacement and the
new relative. Now that we have 64 bit registers, why not have an RR
instruction where the first register the modifying value
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Date: 2012/11/26 16:21
Subject:Re: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction.
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
OK, bad example. I'm stuck on a z9BC, likely until the end
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 7:43 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction.
Very nice. I still kind of like the idea
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:21 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Stupid? though on a new execute instruction.
What about simply
Jc *+2/4/6
does