Why do people find it so hard to reply to the same list
on which the original message appears? I don't know that
I've seen Dave on ASSEMBLER-LIST.
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:16, Gord Tomlin wrote:
Dave, can you repost your instruction sequences one above the other? For
me, they are garbled and I
Paul, I saw Dave's post here on ASSEMBLER-LIST and replied to it here on
ASSEMBLER-LIST before I was even aware that Dave had also posted it on
IBM-MAIN. Dave has posted here several times before, and FWIW I think
his post was quite appropriate for ASSEMBLER-LIST. After all, one of his
products
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:45:29 -0700, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
Why do people find it so hard to reply to the same list
on which the original message appears? I don't know that
I've seen Dave on ASSEMBLER-LIST.
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:16, Gord Tomlin wrote:
Dave, can you repost
We've been using the STOC/LOC (STORE/LOAD ON CONDITION) instructions
for some time...
But, we just noticed a few words in the Principles of Operations (I'm
quoting
from the STOC discussion):
When the condition specified by the M3 field is not met (that is,
store operation is not
